Re: [Linuxptp-devel] [Linuxptp-users] phc2sys jump into huge value

2021-05-01 Thread ramesh t via Linuxptp-devel
hi Jake, Thanks for your response. Not sure I follow here. You mean BC as in the boundary clock you're connected to? >> Yes. You could possibly filter or average the delay to remove outliers, but I am not sure how this impacts things. Other experts on this list are probably better to answer that.

Re: [Linuxptp-devel] [Linuxptp-users] phc2sys jump into huge value

2021-04-29 Thread Jacob Keller
On 4/29/2021 8:04 AM, ramesh t wrote: > hello Jake, > > Did time profiling using time ticks.  > Under the problem condition, observing clock_gettime of interface > connected to BC is taking more time ticks. This results in phc offset > jumping to 4 digit value momentarily. Also i'm not sure if r

Re: [Linuxptp-devel] [Linuxptp-users] phc2sys jump into huge value

2021-04-29 Thread ramesh t via Linuxptp-devel
hi Richard, We have core pinned the ptp4l and phc2sys process to run on non system cores. Do think chrt is required? Please suggest. Thanks for your support. Regards,Ramesh On Thursday, April 29, 2021, 08:45:26 PM GMT+5:30, Richard Cochran wrote: On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 03:04:07PM +000

Re: [Linuxptp-devel] [Linuxptp-users] phc2sys jump into huge value

2021-04-29 Thread Richard Cochran
On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 03:04:07PM +, ramesh t via Linuxptp-users wrote: > Did time profiling using time ticks. Under the problem condition, > observing clock_gettime of interface connected to BC is taking more > time ticks. This results in phc offset jumping to 4 digit value > momentarily. Al

Re: [Linuxptp-devel] [Linuxptp-users] phc2sys jump into huge value

2021-04-29 Thread ramesh t via Linuxptp-devel
hello Jake, Did time profiling using time ticks. Under the problem condition, observing clock_gettime of interface connected to BC is taking more time ticks. This results in phc offset jumping to 4 digit value momentarily. Also i'm not sure if reading across numa is triggering this issue. Pleas