Thank you Richard for your help.
> So we don't actually support TC or TAB. Those patches were only a
rudimentary proof of concept. Did you see the TODO list?
Yes, I saw it and I am looking forward to 2.0.
Until then I stick with an endpoint only implementation. In fact the
differentiation of L
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 12:32:46PM +0200, Burkhard Ilsen wrote:
> My use case is a bridged end-station, i.e. a time-aware bridge with an
> application that needs to be synchronized.
So we don't actually support TC or TAB. Those patches were only a
rudimentary proof of concept. Did you see the T
>> According to 802.1 AS all message timestamps shall be based on a free
>> running clock (LocalClock) in order to minimize the errors resulting from a
>> varying clock frequency.
>> Also phase discontinuities in the pdelay_resp(fup) messages are avoided this
>> way.
>> So the SlaveClock control
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 10:45:16AM +0200, Burkhard Ilsen wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 08:55:34PM +, Richard Cochran wrote:
> > So I do want to have TC/TAB in linuxptp for version 2.0.
>
> According to 802.1 AS all message timestamps shall be based on a free running
> clock (LocalClock) in
Hello,
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 08:55:34PM +, Richard Cochran wrote:
> So I do want to have TC/TAB in linuxptp for version 2.0.
According to 802.1 AS all message timestamps shall be based on a free running
clock (LocalClock) in order to minimize the errors resulting from a varying
clock freq
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 10:23:31PM +, Erik Hons wrote:
> Can you share the TC concept you did? And the direction you need it
> to go?
Yes, I will. Watch this spot!
> It wouldn't happen to be this would it:
> https://github.com/richardcochran/linuxptp-as/
No, that is one of three repos that
-devel] 802.1AS Time-Aware Bridge
Hi Erik,
I was interested in getting this working in the past but have not had a chance
to dedicate the energy.
What type of HW configuration are you looking at making it work with?
Regards,
Chris
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 11:51 AM, Erik Hons
mailto:erik.h...@ni.com
ichardcochran/linuxptp-as/
-Original Message-
From: Richard Cochran [mailto:richardcoch...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2016 3:55 PM
To: Erik Hons
Cc: linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Linuxptp-devel] 802.1AS Time-Aware Bridge
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 06:51:35PM +00
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 06:51:35PM +, Erik Hons wrote:
> Is there a technical or deliberate reason that ptp4l doesn't support
> 802.1AS time-aware bridge?
The only reason is that this feature would be a lot of work.
> If not, would the project be open to that being contributed?
(Wow, you hav
