That is misleading. Some earlier versions of uclibc completely lack
clock_nanosleep().
Petr
On 23/05/17 06:42, Richard Cochran wrote:
> On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 11:05:39PM +0200, Petr Kulhavy wrote:
>> If you don't like it, please take my email just as a bugreport: linuxptp
>> fails to build with
Hi Richard,
I'm not sure that you fully understand the problem. It seems there are
currently four scenarios possible.
1) Some earlier versions of uclibc don't have clock_nanosleep() at all.
In some versions it is configurable as you correctly mentioned, so we
have case 2) is present and selecte
