On Mon, Sep 05, 2022 at 04:35:58PM +0200, Kurt Kanzenbach wrote:
> Yes, this should work. Thanks!
Kurt,
Does this mean you can use the dscp_ settings, and the new
"socket_priority" from your patch isn't needed?
Thanks,
Richard
___
Linuxptp-devel ma
On Tue, May 04, 2021 at 04:46:59AM -0700, Richard Cochran wrote:
> On Mon, May 03, 2021 at 05:09:09PM +0200, Michael Walle wrote:
> > did I miss something or wasn't there a 3.2 release?
>
> You didn't miss anything. I have been delayed in pushing out the 3.2
> release.
Next release will be 4.0 a
On Thu, Jul 21, 2022 at 03:10:40PM +0530, Siddharth Vadapalli via
Linuxptp-devel wrote:
> Remove the unreachable switch case TS_SOFTWARE.
>
> Signed-off-by: Siddharth Vadapalli
> ---
> sk.c | 3 ---
> 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/sk.c b/sk.c
> index b55d6b5..a49bcf4 100644
>
On Thu, Jul 21, 2022 at 01:20:47PM +, Geva, Erez wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think the "if (type != TS_SOFTWARE" is wrong.
> The "type" only refer to TX.
No, "type" is an enumerated value, timestamp_type, and it describes
the flavor of time stamping in use.
> But hwts_init() also set the RX.
> So no
On Sun, Sep 25, 2022 at 11:37:31AM -0700, Michael Galassi wrote:
> I've developed the habit of closing all non-exhaustive switches where
> no sensible default exists with a default which asserts with a
> meaningful diagnostic. Doing so has helped me find a number of my own
> mistaken assumptions.
On Sun, Sep 25, 2022 at 11:23 AM Richard Cochran
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 21, 2022 at 03:10:40PM +0530, Siddharth Vadapalli via
> Linuxptp-devel wrote:
> > Remove the unreachable switch case TS_SOFTWARE.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Siddharth Vadapalli
> > ---
> > sk.c | 3 ---
> > 1 file changed, 3 de
