Re: [Linuxptp-devel] [PATCH] The daemon should not downgrade the RX filter. An AVB/TSN application may use it.

On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 11:26:25AM -0700, Cliff Spradlin via Linuxptp-devel wrote: > I feel like this would be better implemented as a config option - for > example, an option to not adjust SIOCSHWTSTAMP at all, or to have an > explicit value to set it to. > > My preference would be to have an

Re: [Linuxptp-devel] [PATCH] The daemon should not downgrade the RX filter. An AVB/TSN application may use it.

I feel like this would be better implemented as a config option - for example, an option to not adjust SIOCSHWTSTAMP at all, or to have an explicit value to set it to. My preference would be to have an option to not adjust it. Then you could use hwstamp_ctl or another program before running ptp4l

[Linuxptp-devel] [PATCH] The daemon should not downgrade the RX filter. An AVB/TSN application may use it.

Signed-off-by: Erez Geva --- sk.c | 11 ++- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/sk.c b/sk.c index f18b2bf..de8bf58 100644 --- a/sk.c +++ b/sk.c @@ -55,8 +55,17 @@ static int hwts_init(int fd, const char *device, int rx_filter, int tx_type)