Hello everybody,
are there any ideas how LinuxPTP could be used in virtual machines?
It would be sufficient to be able to use the exact time generated by PTP,
e.g. with LinuxPTP running on the host system.
Thank you very much
Hans
___
On Tue, Oct 01, 2019 at 12:30:15AM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Oct 2019 at 00:14, Keller, Jacob E wrote:
> > So what's the argument for not increasing the default history depth a
> > little to help alleviate the need to reconfigure it?
As I said in my other reply, there is no
On Sat, Sep 28, 2019 at 03:34:14PM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
>
> From an application socket's perspective, it may happen from time to
> time that follow-up messages are delayed and received not 1 sync message
> too late, but 2 sync messages too late (or more).
Then it is "game over".
The
On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 02:50:41PM +, RAVEENDRA M via Linuxptp-devel wrote:
> I have downloaded latest linuxptp code from sourceforget,net and build the
> ptp4l. I am running ptp master with two step mode.
> But seeing following errors,
>
>
> [root@mavdu linuxptp]#
> [root@mavdu linuxptp]#
On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 07:16:31PM +, Rodney Cummings wrote:
> In 1588-2008, 8.2.5.4.3, portDS.logSyncInterval is specified per-port.
> If the Sync interval was mandated to be the same on all ports, it would
> exist in defaultDS or similar. In 1588-2008, 7.7.2.3, NOTE 1 even provides
> an
> -Original Message-
> From: Vladimir Oltean [mailto:olte...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, September 30, 2019 3:07 PM
> To: Keller, Jacob E
> Cc: richardcoch...@gmail.com; linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Linuxptp-devel] [PATCH] port: Deal with higher-order
>
On Tue, 1 Oct 2019 at 00:34, Keller, Jacob E wrote:
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Vladimir Oltean [mailto:olte...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Monday, September 30, 2019 2:30 PM
> > To: Keller, Jacob E
> > Cc: richardcoch...@gmail.com; linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> > Subject: Re:
> -Original Message-
> From: Vladimir Oltean [mailto:olte...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, September 30, 2019 2:30 PM
> To: Keller, Jacob E
> Cc: richardcoch...@gmail.com; linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Linuxptp-devel] [PATCH] port: Deal with higher-order
>
Hi Jake,
On Tue, 1 Oct 2019 at 00:14, Keller, Jacob E wrote:
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Vladimir Oltean [mailto:olte...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Saturday, September 28, 2019 5:34 AM
> > To: richardcoch...@gmail.com
> > Cc: linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> > Subject:
> -Original Message-
> From: Vladimir Oltean [mailto:olte...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Saturday, September 28, 2019 5:34 AM
> To: richardcoch...@gmail.com
> Cc: linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: [Linuxptp-devel] [PATCH] port: Deal with higher-order sync/follow-up
> reordering
>
> So
Hi Richard.
I agree on all points.
Some specific responses...
> It is a sad fact that many so-called 1588 "profiles" mandate new behaviors
> in arbitrary and mostly pointless ways...
> In many cases authors of profiles apparently felt no obligation to follow
> the specification.
I couldn't
The following are the ethernet nic interface details
[root@mavdu ~]# ethtool -i eth0
driver: ixgbe
version: 5.1.0-k-rh7.6
firmware-version: 0x86d6, 1.1275.0
expansion-rom-version:
bus-info: :04:00.0
supports-statistics: yes
supports-test: yes
supports-eeprom-access: yes
12 matches
Mail list logo
