On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 10:14:00PM +0530, Lokesh Vutla wrote:
> Any luck with the setup?
I'll try it as soon as it can...
Thanks,
Richard
___
Linuxptp-devel mailing list
Linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Hi Richard,
On 17/05/20 6:39 pm, Lokesh Vutla via Linuxptp-devel wrote:
>
>
> On 17/05/20 2:44 AM, Richard Cochran wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 10:00:06AM +0530, Lokesh Vutla wrote:
>>> Following dependencies are needed in kernel for testing:
>>> - Grygorii's series to support
On 19/05/20 9:16 pm, Richard Cochran wrote:
> On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 11:41:45AM +, Geva, Erez wrote:
>> From a quick look.
>> It seems that it is 'pwmchip%d' for a long time.
>>
>> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v4.0/source/drivers/pwm/sysfs.c#L314
>
> Looks like my v4.19.25-rt16 kernel
>From a quick look.
It seems that it is 'pwmchip%d' for a long time.
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v4.0/source/drivers/pwm/sysfs.c#L314
Erez
-Original Message-
From: Richard Cochran
Sent: Saturday, 16 May 2020 21:15
To: Lokesh Vutla
Cc: Sekhar Nori ;
On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 11:41:45AM +, Geva, Erez wrote:
> From a quick look.
> It seems that it is 'pwmchip%d' for a long time.
>
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v4.0/source/drivers/pwm/sysfs.c#L314
Looks like my v4.19.25-rt16 kernel has a bad commit with a regression.
The documentation,
On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 04:26:33PM -0700, Jacob Keller wrote:
> Yep, the current code doing that is incorrect if the platform can't do
> unaligned access.
But only if the pointer is actually not aligned. The way the buffers
are allocated and the message definitions ensure proper alignment. In
a
