On Tue, Oct 05, 2021 at 12:27:14PM +0200, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 04, 2021 at 06:56:50AM -0700, Richard Cochran wrote:
> > How about this?
> >
> > 1. Refactor the setting of clock.tds into a common helper function, as
> >you suggest.
> >
> > 2. Provide a global function to clear the LS flags, called from
> >port_tx_announce explicitly.
> >
> >This could be clock_update_utc_offset(), but the name might suggest
> >that the clock would be stepped. Maybe clock_clear_leap_flags()
> >instead?
>
> Or maybe clock_update_leap_status()? I have no strong preference for
> any of the three.
okay.
It would make even more sense to me to call it from the timer
expiration block, like so:
case FD_MANNO_TIMER:
pr_debug("%s: master tx announce timeout", p->log_name);
port_set_manno_tmo(p);
+ clock_update_leap_status(p->clock);
return port_tx_announce(p, NULL) ? EV_FAULT_DETECTED : EV_NONE;
> > 3. And BTW, the naming of clock_update_grandmaster() isn't great.
> >Long ago I couldn't think of a better name at the time. It sounds
> >like it would update something about a remote GM.
>
> I think it's consistent with clock_update_slave(). If one is renamed,
> should the other follow?
Good point. Let's leave them alone then.
Thanks,
Richard
___
Linuxptp-devel mailing list
Linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-devel
