Re: [Linuxptp-devel] Need suggestion on step_threshold

2021-11-08 Thread Richard Cochran
On Mon, Nov 08, 2021 at 12:34:08PM +0100, Luigi 'Comio' Mantellini wrote: > (my message was rejected... why?) Looks like both messages were in fact published on the list. Sorry about SF, but I have very little control over the mailing list. I plan to move the project off of SF as soon as I can.

Re: [Linuxptp-devel] [PATCH] Set grandmasterIdentity to localClockIdentity

2021-11-08 Thread Richard Cochran
On Mon, Nov 08, 2021 at 09:44:27AM +, Joanna Yurdal wrote: > Without the proposed patch the result of pmc "get time_status" when lost > synchronization with external GM shows: > pmc -u -b 0 'get time_status' : > c86314.fffe.30006e-0 seq 0 RESPONSE MANAGEMENT TIME_STATUS_NP >

Re: [Linuxptp-devel] [PATCH] Set grandmasterIdentity to localClockIdentity

2021-11-08 Thread Joanna Yurdal
Hi Erez, You had a good point :-) I wrote the message as a commit message - ie what will be the case after applying the patch. I can see now that it was confusing and I should have provided the info of the issue first. Problem description attached in the last mail with the results of the pmc

Re: [Linuxptp-devel] [PATCH] Set grandmasterIdentity to localClockIdentity

2021-11-08 Thread Geva, Erez
Hi, You wrote "gmPresent" set to false. In this mail you show that "gmPresent" is true. I did not check the patch. Only ask to write a more understandable and comprehensive explanation for the patch. Explanation that describe the issue/bug/problem properly, and how is your patch fix the

Re: [Linuxptp-devel] Need suggestion on step_threshold

2021-11-08 Thread Luigi 'Comio' Mantellini
(my message was rejected... why?) Hi ramesh, I don't know your system's precision. I tuned the step_threshold and first_step_threshold values following this criteria: Given my system's precision ( ha scritto: > > hi, > > Rms value of PTP slave/support is taking longer duration (1-2 hours) to

Re: [Linuxptp-devel] Need suggestion on step_threshold

2021-11-08 Thread Luigi 'Comio' Mantellini
Hi ramesh, I don't know your system's precision. I tuned the step_threshold and first_step_threshold values following this criteria: Given my system's precision ( ha scritto: > hi, > > Rms value of PTP slave/support is taking longer duration (1-2 hours) to > come back to single/two digit value.

Re: [Linuxptp-devel] [PATCH] Set grandmasterIdentity to localClockIdentity

2021-11-08 Thread Joanna Yurdal
Without the proposed patch the result of pmc "get time_status" when lost synchronization with external GM shows: pmc -u -b 0 'get time_status' : c86314.fffe.30006e-0 seq 0 RESPONSE MANAGEMENT TIME_STATUS_NP master_offset 192 ingress_time

[Linuxptp-devel] Need suggestion on step_threshold

2021-11-08 Thread ramesh t via Linuxptp-devel
hi, Rms value of PTP slave/support is taking longer duration (1-2 hours) to come back to single/two digit value. Oct 29 01:21:37 ptp4l_slave: [2115639.889] handle_state_decision_event PS_LISTENING Oct 29 01:21:37 ptp4l_slave: [2115640.178] selected best master clock 28affd.fffe.e5de3f Oct 29