Re: [Linuxptp-devel] [Linuxptp-users] How do I implement Sync message receive timeout according to Automotive and 802.1 AS profiles?

2019-09-28 Thread Rodney Cummings
feature-by-feature support for things that automotive uses, I think that would be a better strategy at this time. For example, once 1588-2020 and 802.1AS-2020 are published, linuxptp could support the "externalPortConfiguration" feature, which is the formalized feature to disable t

Re: [Linuxptp-devel] [Linuxptp-users] How do I implement Sync message receive timeout according to Automotive and 802.1 AS profiles?

2019-09-30 Thread Rodney Cummings
Hi Richard. I agree on all points. Some specific responses... > It is a sad fact that many so-called 1588 "profiles" mandate new behaviors > in arbitrary and mostly pointless ways... > In many cases authors of profiles apparently felt no obligation to follow > the specification. I couldn't agre

Re: [Linuxptp-devel] [RFC V2] Add IEEE 802.1AS-2011 time-aware bridge support

2019-10-14 Thread Rodney Cummings
want to avoid "gptp" or "802.1AS" in the naming of items 1-8, that sounds fine, because they are not necessarily exclusive to 802.1AS in the future. Rodney > -Original Message- > From: Yangbo Lu > Sent: Monday, October 14, 2019 5:27 AM > To: linuxptp

Re: [Linuxptp-devel] [RFC V2] Add IEEE 802.1AS-2011 time-aware bridge support

2020-02-21 Thread Rodney Cummings
; when asked "What is it?". Overall, it seems safer to start with an assumption that it is a BC, and then take advantage of TC implementation if/when it makes sense. Doing it the other way (i.e., assuming TC overall and BC for the exceptions) seems a bit risky to me. Rodney C

Re: [Linuxptp-devel] [RFC V2] Add IEEE 802.1AS-2011 time-aware bridge support

2020-03-17 Thread Rodney Cummings
x27;m assuming we don't want to bother. If you or others on the list disagree with these recommendations, that's totally 100% good by me. I'm just throwing them out as suggestions. Rodney Cummings National Instruments > -Original Message- > From: Richard Cochran

Re: [Linuxptp-devel] [RFC V2] Add IEEE 802.1AS-2011 time-aware bridge support

2020-03-23 Thread Rodney Cummings
33 PM > To: Rodney Cummings > Cc: Y.b. Lu ; Erik Hons ; linuxptp- > de...@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Re: [RFC V2] Add IEEE 802.1AS-2011 time-aware > bridge support > > On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 04:41:14PM +, Rodney Cummings wrote: > > Recommendation:

Re: [Linuxptp-devel] [RFC V2] Add IEEE 802.1AS-2011 time-aware bridge support

2020-03-25 Thread Rodney Cummings
t: Tuesday, March 24, 2020 3:38 AM > To: Richard Cochran > Cc: Rodney Cummings ; Erik Hons > ; linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [Linuxptp-devel] [RFC V2] Add IEEE 802.1AS-2011 > time-aware bridge support > > Am 2020-03-20 18:32, s

Re: [Linuxptp-devel] [RFC V2] Add IEEE 802.1AS-2011 time-aware bridge support

2020-03-26 Thread Rodney Cummings
em is syncLocked, otherwise it isn't. > -Original Message- > From: Michael Walle > Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2020 11:42 AM > To: Rodney Cummings > Cc: Richard Cochran ; Erik Hons > ; linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [Linuxptp-devel] [RFC V2]

Re: [Linuxptp-devel] [RFC V2] Add IEEE 802.1AS-2011 time-aware bridge support

2020-03-26 Thread Rodney Cummings
Thanks Vedang. I stand corrected. From: Patel, Vedang Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 6:45 PM To: Rodney Cummings Cc: Michael Walle ; Richard Cochran ; Erik Hons ; linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [Linuxptp-devel] [RFC V2] Add IEEE 802.1AS-2011 time-aware bridge

Re: [Linuxptp-devel] [PATCH] ptp4l: version preparation for IEEE 1588-2019

2021-02-24 Thread Rodney Cummings
27;t attend the meetings: https://sagroups.ieee.org/1588/contact/ Rodney Cummings IEEE 1588 Vice Chair > -Original Message- > From: Richard Cochran > Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2021 9:18 AM > To: Y.b. Lu > Cc: Linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: