Itkin
Cc: linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Linuxptp-devel] [PATCH] Avoid switching PHC while free_running
External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
On Mon, May 01, 2023 at 02:17:21PM +0300, Eyal Itkin via Linuxptp-devel wrote:
> A Boundary Clock might cho
On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 01:34:56PM +, Eyal Itkin wrote:
> Our use case is using the Slave Event Monitoring feature alongside
> free_running so to implement an external servo - on a BC with jbod.
I would encourage you to contribute the servo. After all, the code is
modular with PI, linear
On Mon, May 01, 2023 at 02:17:21PM +0300, Eyal Itkin via Linuxptp-devel wrote:
> A Boundary Clock might choose to switch a PHC when jbod is active,
> and the transition will be based on the port's phc_index. However,
> while free_running the phc_index is -1, thus causing a fault in the
>
A Boundary Clock might choose to switch a PHC when jbod is active,
and the transition will be based on the port's phc_index. However,
while free_running the phc_index is -1, thus causing a fault in the
transition.
Hence, check for free_running before attempting to switch PHC.
Signed-off-by: Eyal
A Boundary Clock might choose to switch a PHC when jbod is active,
and the transition will be based on the port's phc_index. However,
while free_running the phc_index is -1, thus causing a fault in the
transition.
Hence, check for free_running before attempting to switch PHC.
Signed-off-by: Eyal