On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 11:04:16AM +0200, Nico Augustijn wrote:
> The selection of the parameters would be based on the "perceived locking
> distance". This could be a user-settable threshold. For instance, in our
> particular situation we'd want to switch to much "slower" parameters when
> we'r
urrent servo". Could you expand a bit on that?
Regards,
Nico.
-Original Message-
From: Miroslav Lichvar [mailto:mlich...@redhat.com]
Sent: dinsdag 29 maart 2016 15:54
To: Nico Augustijn
Cc: linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Linuxptp-devel] An update to or a new PI(D
On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 02:44:26PM +0200, Nico Augustijn wrote:
> Last week, we've upgraded the RTL of the board to use a 10 Gb MAC and found
> that it introduced a fair amount of jitter on the PPS of the system compared
> with 1Gb.
> We believe this could be mitigated by introducing a second, "s
Hello people,
We've been using ptp4l (1.6) here to synchronize a Xilinx MicroBlaze (soft
core) processor to a PTP master and have had some excellent results; once we
have a stable lock on the master, the maximum time jitter is only about 20
nanoseconds. And that was with only a simple and cheap
