Re: [Linuxptp-devel] [PATCH RFC 2/3] Inhibit sync messages from unwilling 802.1AS ports.

2013-12-04 Thread Delio Brignoli
On Dec 3, 2013, at 6:21 PM, Richard Cochran wrote: On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 11:39:30AM +0100, Delio Brignoli wrote: As would I. Thank you Richard for taking the time to prepare this patch series. So does this fix the issue you were seeing? It does fix that particular issue. If so, I'll

Re: [Linuxptp-devel] [PATCH RFC 2/3] Inhibit sync messages from unwilling 802.1AS ports.

2013-12-18 Thread Delio Brignoli
On Dec 18, 2013, at 9:06 AM, Richard Cochran wrote: On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 12:44:22PM +0100, Delio Brignoli wrote: Hello Richard, Any news about this series? Let me know if you'd like me to respin it instead. I will push this out later today. Thank you! -- Delio

Re: [Linuxptp-devel] [PATCH RFC 0/4] Time stamp asymmetry correction

2014-12-08 Thread Delio Brignoli
Hello Richard, We implemented this correction in our driver using a private IOCTL and it would have been nice to have used some standardised interface instead. However, I think timestamp correction belongs in the PHY’s driver (or whatever is doing the times-tamping). Data sheets report

Re: [Linuxptp-devel] [PATCH RFC 0/4] Time stamp asymmetry correction

2014-12-08 Thread Delio Brignoli
Hi Richard, On 08 Dec 2014, at 13:33, Richard Cochran richardcoch...@gmail.com wrote: […] Because providing corrections in-kernel will be spotty at best, maybe it better just to say, Linux drivers do *not* correct these delays. At leas that makes things consistent. Otherwise end users will

Re: [Linuxptp-devel] [PATCH RFC 0/4] Time stamp asymmetry correction

2014-12-10 Thread Delio Brignoli
Hello Jiri, On 10 Dec 2014, at 09:10, Jiri Benc jb...@redhat.com wrote: On Mon, 8 Dec 2014 14:04:56 +0100, Delio Brignoli wrote: Yes, I was thinking it would allow to query if the driver supports this feature and get/set current offsets. I agree. That way, with correctly implemented

Re: [Linuxptp-devel] Peer delay regression in v1.6

2015-10-22 Thread Delio Brignoli
Hello Richard, Thank you for spotting this issue. We haven’t been hit by it (yet!) because we use an old version of linuxptp. I hope to be able to move to a more recent release at some point. The fix you propose seems good to me. Thanks! -- Delio Brignoli AudioScience Inc On 22 Oct 2015

Re: [Linuxptp-devel] Config option "assume_two_step"

2016-09-21 Thread Delio Brignoli
Hello Henry, If I recall correctly, assume_two_step is there to accommodate section 11.4.2.3 of 802.1AS-2011 where it says that the twoStepFlag is “Reserved as TRUE, ignored on reception”. Regards -- Delio > On 21 Sep 2016, at 11:20, Jesuiter, Henry (ALC NetworX GmbH) >

Re: [Linuxptp-devel] Synchronize PWM to CPTS internal counter

2016-12-02 Thread Delio Brignoli
hardware timestamp events and adjust the clock source for the relevant DMTimer using said hardware timestamp events and localclock <—-> gPTP mapping calculated by linuxptp. HTH -- Delio Brignoli AudioScience Inc > On 30 Nov 2016, at 21:59, David Cemin <david.ce...@coveloz.com>