Re: [Linuxptp-devel] [PATCH 2/2] port: Fix multiple pdelay response handling

2023-11-08 Thread Richard Cochran
On Tue, Nov 07, 2023 at 11:07:21PM +, Choong, Chwee Lin wrote: > Without the proposed fix, the DUT would interpret duplicate > Pdelay_Resp messages as valid responses, leading to undesired > behavior, particularly in achieving the "asCapable" state. Okay, thanks for the clarification.

Re: [Linuxptp-devel] [PATCH 2/2] port: Fix multiple pdelay response handling

2023-11-07 Thread Choong, Chwee Lin
ld interpret duplicate Pdelay_Resp messages as valid responses, leading to undesired behavior, particularly in achieving the "asCapable" state. Thank you, CL -Original Message----- From: Richard Cochran Sent: Tuesday, November 7, 2023 10:21 PM To: Choong, Chwee Lin Cc: linuxp

Re: [Linuxptp-devel] [PATCH 2/2] port: Fix multiple pdelay response handling

2023-11-07 Thread Richard Cochran
On Wed, Nov 08, 2023 at 03:14:06AM +0800, Chwee-Lin Choong wrote: > The current implementation falls short in detecting duplicate > pdelay responses, i.e., multiple responses from the same peer. There can only ever be one peer, and so it is pointless to track the peer. If more than one peer