Re: [Linuxptp-devel] [PATCH v5 00/13] Dynamic sync direction for ts2phc

2022-07-23 Thread Richard Cochran 
On Mon, Mar 07, 2022 at 11:27:02PM +0200, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> Would you mind taking another look at these patches?

Sorry about the massive delay.  I'm done reviewing now.

If you are willing to consider the feed back and re-submit the series,
I'll apply it.

Thanks,
Richard


___
Linuxptp-devel mailing list
Linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-devel

Re: [Linuxptp-devel] [PATCH v5 00/13] Dynamic sync direction for ts2phc

2022-03-07 Thread Richard Cochran 
On Mon, Mar 07, 2022 at 11:27:02PM +0200, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> Would you mind taking another look at these patches?

I'll do it, but I put it last on my list, because this is more complex
than the other open stuff.  I usually order the work from easy to hard.

Thanks,
Richard


___
Linuxptp-devel mailing list
Linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-devel

Re: [Linuxptp-devel] [PATCH v5 00/13] Dynamic sync direction for ts2phc

2022-03-07 Thread Vladimir Oltean 
Hello Richard,

On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 02:14:08AM +0200, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> As discussed in this email thread:
> https://sourceforge.net/p/linuxptp/mailman/message/37047555/
> there is a desire to synchronize multiple DSA switches in a
> boundary_clock_jbod setup, using a PPS signal, and the ts2phc program
> already offers a solid base.

Would you mind taking another look at these patches?


___
Linuxptp-devel mailing list
Linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-devel