Re: [Linuxptp-users] PTP Clock completely wrong on an Intel 82579L

2017-02-23 Thread Keller, Jacob E
> -Original Message- > From: Norbert Lange [mailto:nolang...@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2017 2:20 AM > To: Richard Cochran > Cc: Keller, Jacob E ; linuxptp- > us...@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: Re: [Linuxptp-users] PTP

Re: [Linuxptp-users] PTP Clock completely wrong on an Intel 82579L

2017-02-23 Thread Norbert Lange
Yeah, I seen that matrix, and both NICs are on that list. Still have some rather serious issues, one is completely useless (82579LM, e1000e driver) and the other (i354, igb driver) apparently wraps the timer very 18 minutes, losing their master role. Kind regards, Norbert 2017-02-23 11:13

Re: [Linuxptp-users] PTP Clock completely wrong on an Intel 82579L

2017-02-23 Thread Richard Cochran
On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 10:18:40AM +0100, Norbert Lange wrote: > ptp doesnt work on any intel hardware, this scientific proof was based > on samplesize 2. Sent another mail to that list. > Just out of curiosity, what hardware is this tested on, and verified > to work as master? See:

Re: [Linuxptp-users] PTP Clock completely wrong on an Intel 82579L

2017-02-23 Thread Ledda William EXT
> ptp doesnt work on any intel hardware Probably with the e1000 driver. I have an Intel i350 with the igbx driver. I'm using it since 4 years as both master and slave and I have never had any issue. -Original Message- From: Norbert Lange [mailto:nolang...@gmail.com] Sent: 23 February

Re: [Linuxptp-users] PTP Clock completely wrong on an Intel 82579L

2017-02-23 Thread Norbert Lange
ptp doesnt work on any intel hardware, this scientific proof was based on samplesize 2. Sent another mail to that list. Just out of curiosity, what hardware is this tested on, and verified to work as master? Kind regards, Norbert 2017-02-23 0:16 GMT+01:00 Keller, Jacob E