Re: [Linuxptp-users] [External]Re: Timemaster question with ptp4l and chrony

2021-11-09 Thread Brooks, Jason
So it would seem that while that dummy entry stops the " port 1: received SYNC without timestamp" messages, it doesn't do much good afterwards. -Original Message- From: Miroslav Lichvar Sent: Monday, November 8, 2021 01:09 To: Brooks, Jason Cc: linuxptp-users@lists

Re: [Linuxptp-users] [External]Re: running ptp4l under vmware

2021-11-05 Thread Brooks, Jason
, November 5, 2021 05:53 To: Brooks, Jason ; linuxptp-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [External]Re: [Linuxptp-users] running ptp4l under vmware CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know t

[Linuxptp-users] Timemaster question with ptp4l and chrony

2021-11-04 Thread Brooks, Jason
Hello, I have a laptop configured as a proof of concept system. It's an older Lenovo laptop with an Intel Corporation Ethernet Connection I218-LM (rev 04), configured as an e1000 device. "ethtool -T enp0s25" shows both software and hardware timestamping available. Feeding into this system ar

[Linuxptp-users] running ptp4l under vmware

2021-11-04 Thread Brooks, Jason
Hello, I am trying to build a proof-of-concept systems that will listen for ptp and then serve ntp, but I seem to have a problem: the clock on the system does not seem to get set by ptp, and therefore the clock drifts. I have a test system that uses multiple internet ntp sources and this one: