Richard, thank you for your reply.
> The offset numbers are not the "real offsets" but rather an
> instantaneous estimation. You need another method, like a PPS, to
> measure the actual offset. This can be done once as a calibration
> procedure. Another way is to use the reverse measurement (s
On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 02:06:34PM +0100, Stefano Sambi wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm using ptp4l 2.0. On the slave I'm monitoring the lock status ("s2",
> "s1", "s0") to detect when the synchroniziation fails, and I configured the
> following parameter to be sure the syncronization is always under 10 ms:
>
Hi,
I'm using ptp4l 2.0. On the slave I'm monitoring the lock status ("s2",
"s1", "s0") to detect when the synchroniziation fails, and I configured the
following parameter to be sure the syncronization is always under 10 ms:
step_threshold 0.01
Unfortunately, rarely a spike in the master offset o
