BR
Daniel
Internal
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Hopf, Daniel
Gesendet: Dienstag, 28. November 2023 17:19
An: Richard Cochran
Cc: linuxptp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Betreff: AW: [Linuxptp-users] Slave takes VERY long to sync to Master using
Automotive profile
OK, to phrase it in my und
OK, to phrase it in my understanding:
Master sends SYNC slower than slave "summary_interval":
ptp4l slave reports the sample by "master offset ..."
Master sends SYNC faster than slave "summary_interval"
ptp4l slave reports the (average) statistics by "rms ..."
Is that correct?
Then the only unc
On Mon, Nov 27, 2023 at 08:18:54AM +, Hopf, Daniel wrote:
> Thanks Richard,
>
> Then maybe I misunderstood the output of ptp4l.
> I am specifically confused about the lines indicating "master
> offset" (which in my log started popping up after ~80 seconds, but
> sometimes don't show up even a
eq +5559 path delay 8899
Thanks,
Daniel
Internal
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Richard Cochran
Gesendet: Samstag, 25. November 2023 20:32
An: Hopf, Daniel
Cc: linuxptp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Betreff: Re: [Linuxptp-users] Slave takes VERY long to sync to Master using
Automo
On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 02:59:25PM +, Hopf, Daniel wrote:
> Following are the logs of a try where they synced up after ~80 seconds.
> Here's the SLAVE log (I increased neighborPropDelayThresh from 800 to 8000
> and set tx_timestamp_timeout to 100 in my slave config file):
> -(~/linuxptp-late
I'm using the newest snapshot of linuxptp (ptp4l -v reports 4.1-00013-g458953c)
for:
- Master device (Intel NUC, containing a Intel i219-V NIC)
- Slave device - an NVIDIA Orin Development Kit (Marvell AQR113C network chip I
think)
>From my understanding, using the automotive profiles, Master and
