Re: [Linuxptp-users] Timemaster question with ptp4l and chrony

2021-11-08 Thread Miroslav Lichvar
On Thu, Nov 04, 2021 at 10:55:49PM +, Brooks, Jason wrote: > 1. Chronyc sources shows > * 210 Number of sources = 5 > * MS Name/IP address Stratum Poll Reach LastRx Last sample > * > ===

[Linuxptp-users] Timemaster question with ptp4l and chrony

2021-11-04 Thread Brooks, Jason
Hello, I have a laptop configured as a proof of concept system. It's an older Lenovo laptop with an Intel Corporation Ethernet Connection I218-LM (rev 04), configured as an e1000 device. "ethtool -T enp0s25" shows both software and hardware timestamping available. Feeding into this system ar

Re: [Linuxptp-users] Timemaster

2018-04-20 Thread Keller, Jacob E
> -Original Message- > From: Jord Pool [mailto:jord.p...@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, April 20, 2018 6:25 AM > To: Miroslav Lichvar > Cc: Yan Yankovskyi via Linuxptp-users > Subject: Re: [Linuxptp-users] Timemaster > > Thank you for you answer! > > When I

Re: [Linuxptp-users] Timemaster

2018-04-20 Thread Jord Pool
After that, it repeatedly outputs the following lines of output every 5 - 10 seconds: ptp4l[10792.643]: port 1: announce timeout ptp4l[10792.643]: config item eno1.udp_ttl is 1 ptp4l[10792.645]: config item (null).dscp_event is 0 ptp4l[10792.645]: config item (null).dscp_general is 0 ptp4l[10792.

Re: [Linuxptp-users] Timemaster

2018-04-20 Thread Jord Pool
When running the command with -l 7 it returns the following output: ptp4l[10705.423]: config item (null).assume_two_step is 0 ptp4l[10705.423]: config item (null).check_fup_sync is 0 ptp4l[10705.423]: config item (null).tx_timestamp_timeout is 1 ptp4l[10705.423]: config item (null).clock_servo is

Re: [Linuxptp-users] Timemaster

2018-04-20 Thread Miroslav Lichvar
On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 03:24:50PM +0200, Jord Pool wrote: > 15:17:55.746473 IP 10.0.0.218.ptp-event > ptp-primary.mcast.net.ptp-event: > UDP, length 44 > 15:17:55.746504 IP 10.0.0.218.ptp-general > > ptp-primary.mcast.net.ptp-general: UDP, length 44 > 15:17:55.784460 IP 10.100.0.1.ptp-event > pt

Re: [Linuxptp-users] Timemaster

2018-04-20 Thread Jord Pool
Thank you for you answer! When I run $ sudo tcpdump | grep ‘ptp’ it does return a lot of the following two messages (repeatedly): 15:17:55.746473 IP 10.0.0.218.ptp-event > ptp-primary.mcast.net.ptp-event: UDP, length 44 15:17:55.746504 IP 10.0.0.218.ptp-general > ptp-primary.mcast.net.ptp-gener

Re: [Linuxptp-users] Timemaster

2018-04-20 Thread Miroslav Lichvar
On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 02:59:09PM +0200, Jord Pool wrote: > I am aiming to let NTP synchronise the system clock by using the shared > memory which I would like to fill by using PTP. Now I have read that > Timemaster is the binary to realise such setup. > ptp4l_option slaveOnly 1 > ptp4l_option

[Linuxptp-users] Timemaster

2018-04-20 Thread Jord Pool
Hi, I am aiming to let NTP synchronise the system clock by using the shared memory which I would like to fill by using PTP. Now I have read that Timemaster is the binary to realise such setup. I have a RHEL 7.5 installation with linuxptp version 1.8.5 installed on it and (ofcourse as included

Re: [Linuxptp-users] timemaster and phc2sys

2017-02-10 Thread FUSTE Emmanuel
Le 10/02/2017 à 09:50, Miroslav Lichvar a écrit : > On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 06:26:25PM +0100, FUSTE Emmanuel wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Why timemaster launch phc2sys with the "-r" option ? >> >> It could be a complete misunderstanding of the doc/code on my side. >> But as the goal is to pass the measur

Re: [Linuxptp-users] timemaster and phc2sys

2017-02-10 Thread Miroslav Lichvar
On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 06:26:25PM +0100, FUSTE Emmanuel wrote: > Hello, > > Why timemaster launch phc2sys with the "-r" option ? > > It could be a complete misunderstanding of the doc/code on my side. > But as the goal is to pass the measurement to ntpd via the ntpshm pseudo > servo to let ntpd

[Linuxptp-users] timemaster and phc2sys

2017-02-09 Thread FUSTE Emmanuel
Hello, Why timemaster launch phc2sys with the "-r" option ? It could be a complete misunderstanding of the doc/code on my side. But as the goal is to pass the measurement to ntpd via the ntpshm pseudo servo to let ntpd do the system clock adjustments and updates, "-r" is irrelevant and will ste