> Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2017 9:37 AM
>
> On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 07:57:46AM +, Joerg Christian (LWE) wrote:
> > When I stepped the master clock I had this result on the slave, no
> > matter what value I use for fault_reset_interval. I have always the s0 for
> > 16
> seconds.
>
> It's not
On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 07:57:46AM +, Joerg Christian (LWE) wrote:
> When I stepped the master clock I had this result on the slave, no matter
> what value I use for
> fault_reset_interval. I have always the s0 for 16 seconds.
It's not related to the fault reset interval. In the s0 state the