Re: [Linuxptp-users] clock_nanosleep on /dev/ptpX

2014-02-21 Thread Ledda William EXT
Richard, > Well, now that we have CLOCK_TAI in Linux, that takes of the leap second > issue. Which is the kernel version that include CLOCK_TAI? Thanks William -Original Message- From: Richard Cochran [mailto:richardcoch...@gmail.com] Sent: 19 February 2014 16:08 To: Ledda William

Re: [Linuxptp-users] clock_nanosleep on /dev/ptpX

2014-02-21 Thread Richard Cochran
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 08:50:43AM +, Ledda William EXT wrote: > Which is the kernel version that include CLOCK_TAI? v3.10 HTH, Richard -- Managing the Performance of Cloud-Based Applications Take advantage of what t

Re: [Linuxptp-users] clock_nanosleep on /dev/ptpX

2014-02-21 Thread Richard Cochran
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 09:58:12AM +0100, Richard Cochran wrote: > On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 08:50:43AM +, Ledda William EXT wrote: > > Which is the kernel version that include CLOCK_TAI? > > v3.10 But there was an early bug. Make sure you use the latest stable kernel. Thanks, Richard ---

Re: [Linuxptp-users] clock_nanosleep on /dev/ptpX

2014-02-21 Thread Miroslav Lichvar
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 10:03:12AM +0100, Richard Cochran wrote: > On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 09:58:12AM +0100, Richard Cochran wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 08:50:43AM +, Ledda William EXT wrote: > > > Which is the kernel version that include CLOCK_TAI? > > > > v3.10 > > But there was an e

Re: [Linuxptp-users] clock_nanosleep on /dev/ptpX

2014-02-21 Thread Richard Cochran
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 10:11:33AM +0100, Miroslav Lichvar wrote: > > Hm, should we set the kernel TAI offset (ADJ_TAI) in ptp4l > and phc2sys? I think we should if: 1. the node is slaved to a GM 2. the GM timescale is PTP and is traceable 3. the reported TAI offset differs from the kernel's Th

[Linuxptp-users] One PCs with multiple NICs acting as multiple PTP master / PTP chains

2014-02-21 Thread Koehrer Mathias (ETAS/ESW5)
Hi all, to synchronize a couple (6-8) PCs I want to use one PCs PTP master and the others as PTP slaves. To interconnect the PCs I can use a PTP capable switch. However these switches are fairly expensive. The first question I have: How does a "standard" Ethernet switch perform? Which accuracy

Re: [Linuxptp-users] One PCs with multiple NICs acting as multiple PTP master / PTP chains

2014-02-21 Thread Richard Cochran
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 01:16:09PM +, Koehrer Mathias (ETAS/ESW5) wrote: > Hi all, > > to synchronize a couple (6-8) PCs I want to use one PCs PTP master and the > others as PTP slaves. > To interconnect the PCs I can use a PTP capable switch. However these > switches are fairly expensive. >

Re: [Linuxptp-users] One PCs with multiple NICs acting as multiple PTP master / PTP chains

2014-02-21 Thread Julien Houles
You can try to synchronize several PCs with a standard switch. I measured the delay with one master and one slave and then slightly modified ptp4l with the value obtained (hardcoded). I disabled the delay req messages on the slaves (to avoid messages accumulation on the master side). There is no