Hello List,
I understand PTP in general needs stable/symmetrical round-trip times to be
at it's best and that things like non-PTP-aware switches will introduce
noise.
It makes sense that as the network gets less deterministic and symmetrical
then PTP will necessarily perform worse - probably both
On Tue, Apr 04, 2017 at 06:52:21PM +1000, David Mirabito wrote:
> Is it safe to assume, that given a crappy PTP network ptp4l would just
> degrade to ntp-like performance at worst? Or are there some other
> thresholds or sanity checks which would cause it to throw in the towel in
> situations where
Possibly following on from David’s post.
We have a system with 18 boards in a rack, each board has a Altera SoC with the
STM Ethernet MAC connected via gigabit Ethernet to an Arista ptp-aware switch
and then a Spectracom GrandMaster.
The boards are running Linux kernel 3.15.0.
They lock quickly
Hi,
The device is a:
00:14.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation Ethernet Connection I354
(rev 03)
Using
bash-4.3# ethtool -i ma2
driver: igb
version: 5.3.0-k
firmware-version: 0.0.0
expansion-rom-version:
bus-info: :00:14.1
supports-statistics: yes
supports-test: yes
s
