Re: [Linuxptp-users] Can ptp4l be used without phc2sys?

> -Original Message- > From: Irene Kravets > Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2020 8:35 AM > To: Richard Cochran > Cc: linuxptp-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: [SUSPICIOUS] Re: [Linuxptp-users] Can ptp4l be used without > phc2sys? > > Richard, > I'd still like to understand why I get

Re: [Linuxptp-users] Upgraded from Linuxptp2.0 on Yocto Sumo to Linuxptp2.0 on Dunfell and 1PPS isn't disciplined anymore

> -Original Message- > From: Richard Cochran > Sent: Friday, December 11, 2020 8:36 AM > To: Hutchinson, Brian (US) > Cc: linuxptp-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [Linuxptp-users] Upgraded from Linuxptp2.0 on > The PPS from imx8 is, IIRC, automatically generated b

Re: [Linuxptp-users] Upgraded from Linuxptp2.0 on Yocto Sumo to Linuxptp2.0 on Dunfell and 1PPS isn't disciplined anymore

> -Original Message- > From: Richard Cochran > Sent: Friday, December 11, 2020 9:10 AM > To: Hutchinson, Brian (US) > Cc: linuxptp-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Re: [Linuxptp-users] Upgraded from Linuxptp2.0 on > Yocto Sumo to Linuxptp2.0 on Dunfell and 1PPS isn'

[Linuxptp-users] Is anyone using Linux PTP in a Bonding setup?

So I didn't get any response to my DSA PTP dilemma I recently posted ... so I'll ask a different question. Does anyone use Linux PTP in a Bonding setup? We use a Microchip KSZ 9567 e-switch. We only expose two ports. I can get Linux PTP to work (well kind of, I have 1PPS issues) if I don't us

[Linuxptp-users] Is LinuxPTP and LinuxPPS mutually exclusive?

I saw a curious post on NXP forums (from a NXP employee no less) that their BSP's don't officially support PPS and that one should look to LinuxPPS. So I searched the mailing list archives of both LinuxPTP and LinuxPPS and did not see any evidence of LinuxPTP using LinuxPPS or vice versa. When

Re: [Linuxptp-users] Is LinuxPTP and LinuxPPS mutually exclusive?

Feb 05, 2021 at 02:45:07PM +0000, Brian.Hutchinson--- via Linuxptp- > users wrote: > > > ... which got me to thinking, could LinuxPPS be getting in the way of the > 1PPS we're trying to generate with our fec_ptp imx8mm driver? > > No, certainly not. > > > Wo

[Linuxptp-users] Huge offset delay trying to do G.8275.2 profile when GM connected thru dumb switch vs directly connected to target

Hi, I'm trying to get ptp4l to sync with my GM using G.8275.2 profile using DSA with Microchip PTP support and lan1 acting as an individual NIC. I had this profile working before on a development board that had a dumb phy but now using a board that has a Microchip KSZ9567 which is a 7 port switc

[Linuxptp-users] Using G.8275.2 profile and getting tx timestamp timeout, but changing logSyncInterval etc. changes how often this happens

Hi, I'm using Christian's DSA patches https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/10/19/633) on a NXP iMX8MM with a Microchip ksz9567 with ptp4l.conf setup for E2E G.8275.2 profile. I'm running a 1G RGMII interface and my GM and unit under test is connected via a 1G Netgear dumb switch. Using 5.10.32 kernel w

Re: [Linuxptp-users] Using G.8275.2 profile and getting tx timestamp timeout, but changing logSyncInterval etc. changes how often this happens

e and getting > tx timestamp timeout, but changing logSyncInterval etc. changes how often > this happens > > On Fri, Oct 08, 2021 at 03:22:10PM +, Brian.Hutchinson--- via Linuxptp- > users wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm using Christian's DSA patches >

Re: [Linuxptp-users] Using G.8275.2 profile and getting tx timestamp timeout, but changing logSyncInterval etc. changes how often this happens

t; To: Hutchinson, Brian (US) - PSPC > > Cc: linuxptp-users@lists.sourceforge.net; Christian Eggers > > > > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [Linuxptp-users] Using G.8275.2 profile and > > getting tx timestamp timeout, but changing logSyncInterval etc. > > changes how of

Re: [Linuxptp-users] Using G.8275.2 profile and getting tx timestamp timeout, but changing logSyncInterval etc. changes how often this happens

Hi Vladimir, > -Original Message- > From: Vladimir Oltean > Sent: Monday, October 18, 2021 9:46 AM > To: Christian Eggers > Cc: Hutchinson, Brian (US) - PSPC ; > linuxptp-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [Linuxptp-users] Using G.8275.2 profile and getting > tx timest

Re: [Linuxptp-users] Using G.8275.2 profile and getting tx timestamp timeout, but changing logSyncInterval etc. changes how often this happens

Hi Vladimir, Thanks for digging into this ... answers below. > -Original Message- > From: Vladimir Oltean > Sent: Monday, October 18, 2021 7:40 AM > To: Hutchinson, Brian (US) - PSPC > Cc: linuxptp-users@lists.sourceforge.net; cegg...@arri.de > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [Linuxptp-users] U

Re: [Linuxptp-users] Using G.8275.2 profile and getting tx timestamp timeout, but changing logSyncInterval etc. changes how often this happens

Hi all, I applied the patches Vladimir wanted me to try and am now reporting the findings below. > -Original Message- > From: Vladimir Oltean > Sent: Monday, October 18, 2021 9:46 AM > To: Christian Eggers > Cc: Hutchinson, Brian (US) - PSPC ; > linuxptp-users@lists.sourceforge.net > S

Re: [Linuxptp-users] Using G.8275.2 profile and getting tx timestamp timeout, but changing logSyncInterval etc. changes how often this happens

Hi Vladimir, > -Original Message- > From: Vladimir Oltean > Sent: Monday, October 18, 2021 5:27 PM > To: Hutchinson, Brian (US) - PSPC > Cc: cegg...@arri.de; linuxptp-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [Linuxptp-users] Using G.8275.2 profile and getting > tx timestamp