Re: [Linuxsampler-devel] LS licensing -- was Linuxsampler and Zynthian Project

On 07/07/2016 07:56 PM, RDP wrote: > On 6 July 2016 at 17:28, Christian Schoenebeck > wrote: [..] >> Anyway, I approved your forum user, so you should be able to post now on all >> forums without moderation. And I also changed the board's settings so that >> newly

Re: [Linuxsampler-devel] LS licensing -- was Linuxsampler and Zynthian Project

On 06/29/2016 08:17 PM, RDP wrote: > On 28 June 2016 at 23:12, Robin Gareus <ro...@gareus.org> wrote: >> On 06/28/2016 11:39 PM, Christian Schoenebeck wrote: > >>> .. if you really want license issues to be addressed, sit down, elaborate >>> and suggest >&

Re: [Linuxsampler-devel] LS licensing -- was Linuxsampler and Zynthian Project

On 06/28/2016 11:39 PM, Christian Schoenebeck wrote: > However writing such a long new license text takes a load of free time (which > is already quite limited on my side), energy, research and finally a clear > consent by the developers. I understand. I am however of the strong opinion that

Re: [Linuxsampler-devel] LS licensing -- was Linuxsampler and Zynthian Project

On 06/28/2016 10:20 PM, Christian Schoenebeck wrote: > You know the terms under which LinuxSampler is released, its > clearly and prominently written on the website Sadly no, those terms as self contradictory and hence invalid. One can only assume or guess your intentions. You're on the safe

Re: [Linuxsampler-devel] LS licensing -- was Linuxsampler and Zynthian Project

On 06/28/2016 10:20 PM, Christian Schoenebeck wrote: > Robin, please understand that this issue had been discussed over and over > again on this list. So please refer to the list archive on this one. You are > really not adding anything new on this topic and this has also been discussed > with