we can now send every program change at the beginning
> of our song and not have LS drop most events.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Original Message ----
> Subject: Re: [Linuxsampler-devel] Linuxsampler patch
> From: Christian Schoenebeck
> To: linuxsampler-devel@lists.sourcefo
On Monday 07 March 2011 17:09:17 Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
> On Monday 07 March 2011 15:37:48 Christopher Cherrett wrote:
> > We were sending so much at LS so fast that the program changes were
> > becoming lost from the banks.
> >
> > By merging them we were able to keep them together long eno
On Monday 07 March 2011 15:37:48 Christopher Cherrett wrote:
> We were sending so much at LS so fast that the program changes were
> becoming lost from the banks.
>
> By merging them we were able to keep them together long enough to
> process the extreme amount of data being passed.
You noticed a
song and not have LS drop most events.
Thanks!
Original Message
Subject: Re: [Linuxsampler-devel] Linuxsampler patch
From: Christian Schoenebeck
To: linuxsampler-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: Christopher Cherrett , linuxras
Date: 03/07/2011 07:14 AM
> Hi!
>
> I just
Hi!
I just reviewed your patch shortly for now. Minor question: Is there a reason
that you merged the bank select number into a single variable (and doing
bitshifting/masking later) instead of using separate parameters for program
change und bank select?
Except that, the patch looks OK.
CU
Ch
Christian, my apologies for the delay, as we've been extremely busy
preparing and testing OOM2 for a stable release (and we still have a
little way to go), but attached is the OOM2 linuxsampler patch the
team developed to handle Banks and Patches in the same queue. Since
we've implemented and teste
