On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 12:54 AM, Christian Schoenebeck
wrote:
> On Saturday 24 October 2009 14:20:25 Andreas Persson wrote:
>> The ambitious solution is to extract the RIFF functions to a separate
>> library, and let libsf2 and libgig depend on that. An alternative is to
>> make libsf2 dependent
On Sunday 25 October 2009 13:45:18 Grigor Iliev wrote:
> I guess we are slowly moving to a multi format library, so let it be
> the third option - to merge libsf2 into libgig.
Makes sense, since we actually already got e.g. DLS as another format in
libgig. Guess we soon have to find a new name fo
libsampler?
Original Message
Subject: Re: [Linuxsampler-devel] libsf2 vs libgig
From: Christian Schoenebeck
To: linuxsampler-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Date: 10/25/09 14:07
> On Sunday 25 October 2009 13:45:18 Grigor Iliev wrote:
>
>> I guess we are slowly moving to a multi
libformat?
Original Message
Subject: Re: [Linuxsampler-devel] libsf2 vs libgig
From: Christopher Cherrett
To: Christian Schoenebeck
Cc: linuxsampler-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Date: 10/25/09 17:37
> libsampler?
>
> Original Message
> Subject: Re: [Linuxsamp
most of the short "one word" names are already taken.
it would be confusing if library name conflicts with some other library.
what about 2-word names? for example: libsamplefile.
On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 7:43 PM, Christopher Cherrett <
st...@trackingsolutions.ca> wrote:
> libformat?
>
>
I originally though libsampleformat but thought it might be long
libsampleformat hmm
Original Message
Subject: Re: [Linuxsampler-devel] libsf2 vs libgig
From: Vladimir Senkov
To: Christopher Cherrett
Cc: Christian Schoenebeck ,
linuxsampler-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Da
