Re: [linuxtools-dev] 0.8/Indigo RC4 candidate

2011-06-03 Thread Andrew Overholt
Hi, * Andrew Overholt [2011-06-03 17:06]: > https://hudson.eclipse.org/hudson/job/cbi-linuxtools-Indigo/345/ > [...] > git log b5511d8a4ac.. > > [...] > If someone else can verify that the fixes done since #344 > (b5dab03479..01ce47aeed) are present in #345, I'd appreciate it. I verified th

[linuxtools-dev] 0.8/Indigo RC4 candidate

2011-06-03 Thread Andrew Overholt
Hi, We have a new signed build in updates-nightly [1] that I'd like to be our RC4 contribution: https://hudson.eclipse.org/hudson/job/cbi-linuxtools-Indigo/345/ Please smoke test it and put it through its paces as much as you can. File any and all bugs and we can make the call as to whether th

Re: [linuxtools-dev] LTTng test code

2011-06-03 Thread Francois Chouinard
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Andrew Overholt wrote: >> Is it OK to commit it right away or would it be preferable that I sit >> on it until the v0.8 is tagged? > > Do you mind waiting a few days?  I'd like to keep master open for any > emergency Indigo/0.8 fixes until we actually tag (likely Tu

Re: [linuxtools-dev] LTTng test code

2011-06-03 Thread Andrew Overholt
> Is it OK to commit it right away or would it be preferable that I sit > on it until the v0.8 is tagged? Do you mind waiting a few days? I'd like to keep master open for any emergency Indigo/0.8 fixes until we actually tag (likely Tuesday). Andrew ___

[linuxtools-dev] LTTng test code

2011-06-03 Thread Francois Chouinard
Hi, I've re-factored some LTTng JUnit code that I would like to commit. This is strictly test code that's not even run (yet) as part of the Hudson build. Is it OK to commit it right away or would it be preferable that I sit on it until the v0.8 is tagged? Thanks, -- Francois __

[linuxtools-dev] Hudson build is back to stable : cbi-linuxtools-Indigo #343

2011-06-03 Thread hudsonbuild
See ___ linuxtools-dev mailing list linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev

Re: [linuxtools-dev] Hudson build became unstable: cbi-linuxtools-Indigo #342

2011-06-03 Thread Andrew Overholt
Sorry, I thought these OProfile core tests would pass. I'll either fix them or disable them for the next build. Andrew * hudsonbu...@eclipse.org [2011-06-03 11:29]: > See > > > __

[linuxtools-dev] Hudson build became unstable: cbi-linuxtools-Indigo #342

2011-06-03 Thread hudsonbuild
See ___ linuxtools-dev mailing list linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev

Re: [linuxtools-dev] 0.8 New and Noteworthy

2011-06-03 Thread Andrew Overholt
Hi, I think I've gotten the new and noteworthy for 0.8 taken care of. If anyone thinks something should be added, please do so directly in CVS or let me know and I'll do it. http://www.eclipse.org/linuxtools/new-0.8/ Thanks for the contributions and new features! Andrew _