[linuxtools-dev] Build failed in Hudson: linuxtools-master #420

See Changes: [Jeff Johnston] Fix autotools tests. [Jeff Johnston] Remove need for version specifier for Autoconf editor parser. [Jeff Johnston] Revert previous fix to Autotools tests.

[linuxtools-dev] Build failed in Hudson: linuxtools-master #419

See -- [...truncated 15585 lines...] at org.apache.maven.lifecycle.internal.MojoExecutor.execute(MojoExecutor.java:145) at org.apache.maven.lifecycle.internal.LifecycleModuleBui

Re: [linuxtools-dev] Generation of Help html files from the Linux Tools wiki

On 06/16/2011 12:03 PM, Jeff Johnston wrote: > On 06/16/2011 01:54 PM, Corey Ashford wrote: >> On 06/16/2011 10:40 AM, Andrew Overholt wrote: >>> * Corey Ashford [2011-06-16 13:02]: On 06/16/2011 06:19 AM, Andrew Overholt wrote: > Hi, > >> However, as I understand it, the "how to

Re: [linuxtools-dev] Generation of Help html files from the Linux Tools wiki

On 06/16/2011 01:54 PM, Corey Ashford wrote: On 06/16/2011 10:40 AM, Andrew Overholt wrote: * Corey Ashford [2011-06-16 13:02]: On 06/16/2011 06:19 AM, Andrew Overholt wrote: Hi, However, as I understand it, the "how to update these pages" information seems to imply that the files are gener

Re: [linuxtools-dev] Generation of Help html files from the Linux Tools wiki

On 06/16/2011 10:40 AM, Andrew Overholt wrote: > * Corey Ashford [2011-06-16 13:02]: >> On 06/16/2011 06:19 AM, Andrew Overholt wrote: >>> Hi, >>> However, as I understand it, the "how to update these pages" information seems to imply that the files are generated from the wiki somewhow.

Re: [linuxtools-dev] Generation of Help html files from the Linux Tools wiki

* Corey Ashford [2011-06-16 13:02]: > On 06/16/2011 06:19 AM, Andrew Overholt wrote: > > Hi, > > > >> However, as I understand it, the "how to update these pages" information > >> seems to imply that the files are generated from the wiki somewhow. Is > >> this really true, or is it only a plan t

Re: [linuxtools-dev] Generation of Help html files from the Linux Tools wiki

On 06/16/2011 06:19 AM, Andrew Overholt wrote: > Hi, > >> However, as I understand it, the "how to update these pages" information >> seems to imply that the files are generated from the wiki somewhow. Is >> this really true, or is it only a plan to do this at some point? > > The pages are gener

Re: [linuxtools-dev] [eclipse-build] 3.7.0 Final

* Andrew Overholt [2011-06-16 10:43]: > * Benjamin Drung [2011-06-16 10:38]: > > Am Donnerstag, den 16.06.2011, 10:35 -0400 schrieb Andrew Overholt: > > > Hi, > > > > > > * Benjamin Drung [2011-06-16 10:32]: > > > > Am Mittwoch, den 15.06.2011, 11:17 -0500 schrieb Chris Aniszczyk: > > > > > I m

Re: [linuxtools-dev] [eclipse-build] 3.7.0 Final

* Benjamin Drung [2011-06-16 10:38]: > Am Donnerstag, den 16.06.2011, 10:35 -0400 schrieb Andrew Overholt: > > Hi, > > > > * Benjamin Drung [2011-06-16 10:32]: > > > Am Mittwoch, den 15.06.2011, 11:17 -0500 schrieb Chris Aniszczyk: > > > > I merged the eclipse37 branch into master since the 3.7.

Re: [linuxtools-dev] Libhover support for libraries with GObject Introspection

* sami wagiaalla [2011-06-16 10:34]: > >Handling multiple programming languages for one app in the IDE might be > >nice too - this is something we're trying to push; e.g. write the > >low-level parts of your app in C and the UI/Chrome in Python or JS. > > > > Yes, this is an area of concern. I ha

Re: [linuxtools-dev] [eclipse-build] 3.7.0 Final

Am Donnerstag, den 16.06.2011, 10:35 -0400 schrieb Andrew Overholt: > Hi, > > * Benjamin Drung [2011-06-16 10:32]: > > Am Mittwoch, den 15.06.2011, 11:17 -0500 schrieb Chris Aniszczyk: > > > I merged the eclipse37 branch into master since the 3.7.0 final is out. > > > > [...] > > > > I have sat4

Re: [linuxtools-dev] [eclipse-build] 3.7.0 Final

Hi, * Benjamin Drung [2011-06-16 10:32]: > Am Mittwoch, den 15.06.2011, 11:17 -0500 schrieb Chris Aniszczyk: > > I merged the eclipse37 branch into master since the 3.7.0 final is out. > > [...] > > I have sat4j 2.2.0-3 on my system. The newest available Debian package > version is 2.2.3-1. Ther

Re: [linuxtools-dev] Libhover support for libraries with GObject Introspection

Hey David, Sorry for the late reply. I wanted to go through your email and get some concrete feature requests and see what we can do and what we can add to our one-day-maybe list. I am not a GNOME hacker so i am doing a lot of guessing after brief googling to understand what you mean. See if y

Re: [linuxtools-dev] [eclipse-build] 3.7.0 Final

Am Mittwoch, den 15.06.2011, 11:17 -0500 schrieb Chris Aniszczyk: > I merged the eclipse37 branch into master since the 3.7.0 final is out. > > I pushed the 3.7.0 source also here... > > http://download.eclipse.org/technology/linuxtools/eclipse-build/3.7.x_Indigo/ > > Let me know if you run

[linuxtools-dev] [e...@eclipse.org: [cross-project-issues-dev] Remaining Indigo Release Reviews declared successful!]

Hi, We're good to go for releasing 0.8.0 as part of Indigo. Thanks for all the hard work, everyone! I'll take the release next week and you should see everything for 0.8 listed at http://www.eclipse.org/linuxtools/downloads.php and http://www.eclipse.org/linuxtools/new/, etc. on the 22nd of June

Re: [linuxtools-dev] Generation of Help html files from the Linux Tools wiki

Hi, > However, as I understand it, the "how to update these pages" information > seems to imply that the files are generated from the wiki somewhow. Is > this really true, or is it only a plan to do this at some point? The pages are generated with Mylyn's WikiText tools. There is a file like bu

Re: [linuxtools-dev] [eclipse-build] 3.7.0 Final

Will you be waiting until the official release before posting eclipse-build-0.7.0.tar.bz2? I created it myself by pulling from git, and it did build the Eclipse 3.7.0 source that you posted (after the usual contortions plus a few new ones), but the other Gentoo users would probably appreciate t