On 01/10/2012 09:55 PM, Vladimir Prus wrote:
> On 10/01/12 22:54, Corey Ashford wrote:
>> On 11/27/2011 09:25 PM, Vladimir Prus wrote:
>>> On 22/11/11 23:36, Corey Ashford wrote:
>>>
>>>> Create an enhancement bugzilla to add remote capability to the OPr
On 01/31/2012 10:48 AM, Roland Grunberg wrote:
> As indicated in https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=367457
> it has been proposed that the Massif plugin from Valgrind switch to
> using SWTChart for it's charting/image generation to help downstream
> consumers wishing to reduce their depe
On 01/27/2012 01:50 PM, Andrew Overholt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Gerrit ([1], web-based code review system) is almost ready for usage by
> all eclipse.org projects [2].
>
> How do Linux Tools contributors and committers feel about using it for
> Linux Tools?
I've heard good things about, and it's someth
On 01/10/2012 09:55 PM, Vladimir Prus wrote:
> On 10/01/12 22:54, Corey Ashford wrote:
>> On 11/27/2011 09:25 PM, Vladimir Prus wrote:
>>> On 22/11/11 23:36, Corey Ashford wrote:
>>>
>>>> Create an enhancement bugzilla to add remote capability to the OPr
On 11/27/2011 09:25 PM, Vladimir Prus wrote:
> On 22/11/11 23:36, Corey Ashford wrote:
>
>> Create an enhancement bugzilla to add remote capability to the OProfile
>> plug-in. Then, if you don't already have a github tree for the linux
>> tools source tree, create
On 01/04/2012 02:00 PM, Corey Ashford wrote:
> On 01/04/2012 01:41 PM, Jeff Johnston wrote:
>> On 01/04/2012 02:55 PM, Corey Ashford wrote:
>>> On 01/04/2012 11:46 AM, Jeff Johnston wrote:
>>>> On 01/04/2012 02:10 PM, Corey Ashford wrote:
>>>>> Hi
On 01/04/2012 01:41 PM, Jeff Johnston wrote:
> On 01/04/2012 02:55 PM, Corey Ashford wrote:
>> On 01/04/2012 11:46 AM, Jeff Johnston wrote:
>>> On 01/04/2012 02:10 PM, Corey Ashford wrote:
>>>> Hi Jeff,
>>>>
>>>> I ran across an interesting pro
On 01/04/2012 11:46 AM, Jeff Johnston wrote:
> On 01/04/2012 02:10 PM, Corey Ashford wrote:
>> Hi Jeff,
>>
>> I ran across an interesting problem with using the URI's that are formed
>> in the linuxtools plug-in. I wonder if you have any thoughts on this...
>
Hi Jeff,
I ran across an interesting problem with using the URI's that are formed
in the linuxtools plug-in. I wonder if you have any thoughts on this...
We end up with URI's that look something like:
remotetools:///
The problem that I ran into is that if I instantiate a URI object based
on on
Thanks for your reply, Greg. I have a follow-up question and a comment:
On 11/28/2011 06:12 AM, Greg Watson wrote:
On Nov 22, 2011, at 8:02 PM, Corey Ashford wrote:
On 11/21/2011 01:56 PM, Greg Watson wrote:
On Nov 21, 2011, at 4:15 PM, Corey Ashford wrote:
On 10/17/2011 05:52 AM, Greg
On 11/21/2011 01:56 PM, Greg Watson wrote:
>
> On Nov 21, 2011, at 4:15 PM, Corey Ashford wrote:
>
>> On 10/17/2011 05:52 AM, Greg Watson wrote:
>>>> It's not clear to me why the PTP/RDT developers chose to use a separate
>>>> project type "
On 11/22/2011 11:29 AM, Vladimir Prus wrote:
> On 22/11/11 23:24, Corey Ashford wrote:
>
>>> sorry for delay -- I had to check some things. Yes, we plan to publish
>>> our changes in near future. I should warn that at present, our
>>> code is not entire
On 10/03/2011 02:02 PM, Vladimir Prus wrote:
> On Thursday, September 22, 2011 04:36:38 Corey Ashford wrote:
>> On 06/15/2011 11:18 AM, Vladimir Prus wrote:
>>> On Wednesday, June 15, 2011 02:41:22 Corey Ashford wrote:
>>>> On 06/14/2011 10:08 AM, Siva Velusamy wrot
On 10/17/2011 05:52 AM, Greg Watson wrote:
>> It's not clear to me why the PTP/RDT developers chose to use a separate
>> project type "Remote C/C++ project" and introducing a different mechanism
>> for choosing toolchains, instead of reusing the C/C++ project type. Maybe
>> Greg Watson can fill
On 11/16/2011 05:19 AM, Andrew Overholt wrote:
>> Is there a mailing list I can subscribe to that will tell me when
>> commits have been made to the Linux Tools git tree?
>
> No. I mused about the usefulness of this at the git BoF at EclipseCon
> Europe a few weeks ago. If you think it'd be help
On 11/15/2011 03:10 PM, Chris Aniszczyk wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 3:02 PM, Corey Ashford
> wrote:
>> Is there a mailing list I can subscribe to that will tell me when
>> commits have been made to the Linux Tools git tree?
>
> Not sure... but you can watch thin
Is there a mailing list I can subscribe to that will tell me when
commits have been made to the Linux Tools git tree?
Regards,
- Corey
___
linuxtools-dev mailing list
linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev
On 11/15/2011 08:55 AM, Jeff Johnston wrote:
On 11/14/2011 05:56 PM, Corey Ashford wrote:
Hi Jeff,
One of the use cases we'd like to support is one where a developer is
doing cross compilation on his laptop, and then later, executes on a
remote machine.
Under this model of cross compil
Hi Jeff,
One of the use cases we'd like to support is one where a developer is
doing cross compilation on his laptop, and then later, executes on a
remote machine.
Under this model of cross compilation, it doesn't make sense to acquire
the remote machine's name simply by looking at the project's
On 11/01/2011 05:27 PM, Zhang, Jessica wrote:
Hi Corey,
I've lost track on this email thread but your work is definitely something we
(Yocto Project) can benefit from and we're based on RSE for remote connection.
So want to see any progress on your work as far as get it into the LinuxTools
p
On 10/14/2011 02:01 PM, Jeff Johnston wrote:
I created a new C project (not Remote C/C++ project, because that
doesn't have any autotools toolchains I can select) and selected
the GNU
Autotools Toolchain.
I selected Remote Tools as the filesystem provider, and a valid
remote
directory and co
On 10/13/2011 12:25 PM, Jeff Johnston wrote:
> On 10/13/2011 02:15 PM, Jeff Johnston wrote:
>> On 10/12/2011 09:29 PM, Corey Ashford wrote:
>>> On 10/12/2011 05:56 PM, Corey Ashford wrote:
>>>> On 10/11/2011 12:48 PM, Jeff Johnston wrote:
>>>>> Just t
On 10/12/2011 05:56 PM, Corey Ashford wrote:
> On 10/11/2011 12:48 PM, Jeff Johnston wrote:
>> Just to let people know that I have updated the RDT branch with the
>> extension and plug-in necessary to allow RDT to be optionally connected
>> with Autotools.
>>
>>
On 10/11/2011 12:48 PM, Jeff Johnston wrote:
> Just to let people know that I have updated the RDT branch with the
> extension and plug-in necessary to allow RDT to be optionally connected
> with Autotools.
>
> The extension lists the nature id it supports so in theory, we could
> support alternat
On 10/11/2011 03:00 PM, Jeff Johnston wrote:
> On 10/11/2011 05:03 PM, Corey Ashford wrote:
>> On 10/11/2011 12:48 PM, Jeff Johnston wrote:
>>> On 09/07/2011 05:21 PM, Jeff Johnston wrote:
>>>> Hi Wainer,
>>>>
>>>> No estimated date on th
On 10/11/2011 12:48 PM, Jeff Johnston wrote:
> On 09/07/2011 05:21 PM, Jeff Johnston wrote:
>> Hi Wainer,
>>
>> No estimated date on the prototype. I have it currently in a private git
>> branch. I have done the first part which was to indirectly reference
>> files and launching via a proxy. I stil
Oops. I sent this email to the wrong mailing list. My apologies.
On 09/28/2011 04:29 PM, Corey Ashford wrote:
> I talked briefly with Jeff Johnston and he made the point that you can
> use a script to get around this problem of not having PATH set at the
> time command is invoked.
I talked briefly with Jeff Johnston and he made the point that you can
use a script to get around this problem of not having PATH set at the
time command is invoked. In fact, this approach is already taken in
org.eclipse.linuxtools.profiling.launch.createProcess. Basically, you
create a [remote]
On 09/28/2011 05:32 AM, Michel Dagenais wrote:
>
>> So, what parts of RDT would there be dependencies on?
>> Could these dependencies be optional?
>>
>> I've seen the RDT Launcher mentioned... can you point me to the code,
>> for reviewing it?
>
> We are also interested in this topic for supporti
On 09/28/2011 01:27 AM, Oberhuber, Martin wrote:
> So, what parts of RDT would there be dependencies on?
> Could these dependencies be optional?
>
> I've seen the RDT Launcher mentioned... can you point me to the code, for
> reviewing it?
>
Check out ParallelLaunchConfigurationDelegate in org.e
On 09/27/2011 11:27 AM, Jeff Johnston wrote:
> On 09/26/2011 06:49 PM, Corey Ashford wrote:
>>
>> Hey folks,
>>
>> I'd like to understand where things are with regard to remote launch.
>>
>> We currently have a working remote launcher for Valgrind ove
Hey folks,
I'd like to understand where things are with regard to remote launch.
We currently have a working remote launcher for Valgrind over PTP's RDT
facility. Our implementation essentially re-implements the
org.eclipse.linuxtools.profiling.launch.remote.RemoteConnection package
using RDT's
On 06/15/2011 11:18 AM, Vladimir Prus wrote:
> On Wednesday, June 15, 2011 02:41:22 Corey Ashford wrote:
>> On 06/14/2011 10:08 AM, Siva Velusamy wrote:
>>> Actually, we have OProfile remote solution in development, using RSE.
>>> It presently appears to mostly w
On 08/31/2011 02:40 PM, Jeff Johnston wrote:
> I personally didn't realize there was a Fedora package for eclipse-ptp.
> It is not in RHEL though. From our perspective, we would have to add
> something to RHEL (since Autotools is currently in RHEL). That involves
> QA work for a new package and
On 08/31/2011 11:50 AM, Greg Watson wrote:
> I believe some remote capability is available, and improvements to this are
> being worked on. I can find out the status if you'd be interested.
>
Yes, I (we in the Power Linux SDK team, actually) are interested.
I was unable to get ETFw to launch a
On 08/31/2011 11:38 AM, Greg Watson wrote:
> Sigh.
>
> The PTP org.eclipse.ptp.remote.* plugins are supposed to do exactly this.
> Provide a set of interfaces that work the same for local or remote. You can
> then plug in support for different remote service providers, include RSE and
> Remote
Hello,
I now have all of the permission from IBM needed to post the perf tool
plug-in code. My current plan is to file an Eclipse bugzilla
enhancement request, and then post a pointer to my github tree, which
contains the perf plug-in code.
I should have this done by early tomorrow, if all goes
Hey folks,
I have a prototype launcher for Valgrind working over PTP's Remote
Development Tools API. I basically welded/hacked some code from the
AbstractParallelLaunchDelegate into the
org.eclipse.linuxtools.profiling.remote.RemoteConnection package.
Then I used some tabs from the Parallel Appl
On 07/25/2011 05:29 AM, Andrew Overholt wrote:
>> If these two things go well, I should be able to publish the code by
>> early to mid-August.
>
> Thanks for keeping us posted, Corey!
>
> Andrew
Due to unforeseen circumstances, the posting of the plug-in source has
been pushed back another two w
On 07/28/2011 10:47 AM, Jeff Johnston wrote:
> Hi Corey,
>
> The remote story for linux-tools isn't complete yet and is evolving so
> it's great to have your testing/feedback.
>
> We have started with a basic model whereby an end-user develops locally
> and runs their
> executable on the remote s
Hi,
I had a brief discussion today with Jeff Johnston on the IRC channel
today. I had been experimenting with the new Valgrind support for
remote launch via RSE connections. I ran into a strange problem and it
turned out to be because I had misunderstood the intent of the remote
launch capabilit
Hi all,
It's been awhile since I mentioned what's going on with the Linux perf
tool plug-in. I am still slowly working through the authorization
necessary to post this code up. Next week, I have a meeting with our
internal Eclipse Review Board, whom I hope will approve it. Passing
that is a pre
On 07/15/2011 01:06 PM, Jeff Johnston wrote:
> Hi Corey,
>
> Yes I have seen that bug. It goes away IIRC and I thought I had checked
> in a simple patch to verify
> that the offending line doesn't try to access a null object, but
> apparently I did not.
>
> I got the remote Valgrind stuff workin
Hi Folks,
I thought I'd have a look at the current state of remote Valgrind.
Would you expect that it should work straight out of the Git tree? I
ask because I am seeing an NPE.
I set up an example project using a TM/TCF connection to my laptop (from
the same machine). I then created a small ex
On 06/21/2011 10:09 AM, Siva Velusamy wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 9:47 AM, Corey Ashford
> mailto:cjash...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>> wrote:
>
> On 06/21/2011 05:54 AM, Daniel HB wrote:
>
> Hey Corey!
>
> I think it's a good id
On 06/21/2011 05:54 AM, Daniel HB wrote:
Hey Corey!
I think it's a good idea but I don't think, unfortunately, that is
simple to implement in the case of the Oprofile plugin. It uses a script
to add an entry in the sudoers (Suse) or add a security wrapper for
consolehelper (RHEL). After that it
Hi Folks,
We have an interesting challenge with the Linux Tools Project plug-ins,
and that is being able to determine where each of the linux tool
executables are. I think for most users of the plug-ins, they can
assume that all of the tools are on their search path, for example
/usr/bin/opcontro
On 06/17/2011 10:26 AM, Corey Ashford wrote:
> On 06/17/2011 04:55 AM, Andrew Overholt wrote:
>> * Corey Ashford [2011-06-16 17:34]:
>>> There is another issue, though. The SystemTap documentation doesn't
>>> appear to be derived from the wiki pages, which woul
On 06/17/2011 04:55 AM, Andrew Overholt wrote:
> * Corey Ashford [2011-06-16 17:34]:
>> There is another issue, though. The SystemTap documentation doesn't
>> appear to be derived from the wiki pages, which would explain the
>> malformed HTML. It had a large number
On 06/16/2011 12:03 PM, Jeff Johnston wrote:
> On 06/16/2011 01:54 PM, Corey Ashford wrote:
>> On 06/16/2011 10:40 AM, Andrew Overholt wrote:
>>> * Corey Ashford [2011-06-16 13:02]:
>>>> On 06/16/2011 06:19 AM, Andrew Overholt wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>
On 06/16/2011 10:40 AM, Andrew Overholt wrote:
> * Corey Ashford [2011-06-16 13:02]:
>> On 06/16/2011 06:19 AM, Andrew Overholt wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>> However, as I understand it, the "how to update these pages" information
>>>> seems
On 06/16/2011 06:19 AM, Andrew Overholt wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> However, as I understand it, the "how to update these pages" information
>> seems to imply that the files are generated from the wiki somewhow. Is
>> this really true, or is it only a plan to do this at some point?
>
> The pages are gener
Hi Folks,
I had a look on the Linux Tools wiki and didn't see any discussion of
how the wiki pages are converted to Eclipse help html files.
I ask because I found a number of minor HTML problems with the docs, for
example, badly formed tags (e.g. "https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtoo
On 06/14/2011 10:08 AM, Siva Velusamy wrote:
>
> Actually, we have OProfile remote solution in development, using RSE. It
> presently appears to mostly work. It should be said that
> is not really a matter of tweaking a couple things. We ended up changing
> quite a lot of code. Als
On 06/10/2011 04:43 PM, Anna Dushistova wrote:
>
> On Jun 11, 2011, at 2:36 AM, Siva Velusamy wrote:
>
>> Thanks everyone for your responses. Jeff - see comments inline:
>>
>> Anna has a good point in that we should use RSE. I am going to
>> open a bug to rewrite the Valgrind remote plug
On 06/08/2011 10:14 AM, Jeff Johnston wrote:
> On 06/07/2011 09:51 PM, Corey Ashford wrote:
>> On 05/25/2011 02:52 PM, Jeff Johnston wrote:
>> ...
>>> 2. I would like to cease the shipping of the rpm over to the remote
>>> system. Instead, I would like to
On 05/25/2011 02:52 PM, Jeff Johnston wrote:
...
> 2. I would like to cease the shipping of the rpm over to the remote
> system. Instead, I would like to create a new Fedora/RHEL package
> containing our TCF agent(s). That way it can be installed from the
> remote side using the normal mechanisms
On 05/25/2011 11:13 AM, Maynard Johnson wrote:
> Corey Ashford wrote:
>> Just an update on the status of this code.
>>
>> We got ahold of the source code from the developers in Australia, and
>> it's now controlled in our local git tree.
> Corey, does this plu
Just an update on the status of this code.
We got ahold of the source code from the developers in Australia, and
it's now controlled in our local git tree.
We need to add some header comments and make sure that we can legally
release all of what is in there. I'm not sure how long it will tak
On 05/25/2011 05:30 AM, Andrew Overholt wrote:
Hi,
* Vladimir Prus [2011-05-25 04:55]:
On Tuesday, May 24, 2011 23:14:37 Andrew Overholt wrote:
Many of the previous committers in
this area have moved on to other things and as a project we'd love some
involvement from others here. Your contri
On 04/21/2011 12:19 PM, Jeff Johnston wrote:
> Hi Corey,
>
> You are correct in that you cannot add new options to the Configuration
> Settings pages except via code. The AutotoolsConfiguration has the set
> of options and the Configuration Settings pages are created based on
> them. This was do
Hi,
We are looking to extend the autotools plug-in so that it can use a
different GNU toolchain. specifically a newer one from the one that's in
the distro. At this point, all we really need to do, I think, is to add
the following options CC= and CXX= options to
the configure command.
I had a lo
On 03/31/2011 09:10 AM, James Blackburn wrote:
>
>
> On 31 March 2011 16:41, Corey Ashford <mailto:cjash...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>> wrote:
>
> On 03/31/2011 06:48 AM, Andrew Overholt wrote:
> >> I've been tossing around the idea in my head about a nic
On 03/31/2011 06:48 AM, Andrew Overholt wrote:
>> I've been tossing around the idea in my head about a nice little plug-in
>> to add to the Linux tools suite is CDT C project creation wizard that
>> automates the steps shown here:
>>
>> http://wiki.eclipse.org/HowTo_use_the_CDT_to_navigate_Linux_ke
clipse.org/helios/topic/org.eclipse.cdt.doc.isv/guide/projectTemplateEngine/index.html
>
> On 31 March 2011 02:36, Corey Ashford <mailto:cjash...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I've been tossing around the idea in my head about a nice little
plug-in
>
Hello,
I've been tossing around the idea in my head about a nice little plug-in
to add to the Linux tools suite is CDT C project creation wizard that
automates the steps shown here:
http://wiki.eclipse.org/HowTo_use_the_CDT_to_navigate_Linux_kernel_source
The wizard would prompt for a few things
66 matches
Mail list logo
