Le 24/04/2013 16:59, Alexandre Montplaisir a écrit :
> Ah yes, sometimes we do "ongoing" queries to the state system to get
> attribute names.
> We can also do it for state values themselves (for example, in the
> kernel state provider, in sched_process_fork we will copy over the
> syscall_name att
On 13-04-23 09:41 PM, Florian Wininger wrote:
> Hi Alexandre and Aaron,
>
> Thank you for the discussion.
>
> Replies below,
>
> [...]
> I like this tree defition. But we must add the possibilities to make
> quey on the State Sytem in the path (as was proposed in /New Features in
> TMF about filter
Hi Alexandre and Aaron,
Thank you for the discussion.
Replies below,
Le 23/04/2013 14:22, Alexandre Montplaisir a écrit :
> On 13-04-23 12:40 PM, Aaron Spear wrote:
>> Hi Alexandre,
>>
>> replies below:
>>
>> - Original Message -
>>
>>> - In the XML files to define the state changes, you
On 13-04-23 12:40 PM, Aaron Spear wrote:
> Hi Alexandre,
>
> replies below:
>
> - Original Message -
>> - I think what you call "context" in the stateflow plugin is pretty much
>> the same thing we call "attribute" in the TMF state system. You've
>> probably seen o.e.l.internal.tmf.core.sta
Hi Alexandre,
replies below:
- Original Message -
> - I think what you call "context" in the stateflow plugin is pretty much
> the same thing we call "attribute" in the TMF state system. You've
> probably seen o.e.l.internal.tmf.core.statesystem.Attribute. We already
> use the notion of "
Hi Aaron,
Sorry for not replying earlier, I was swamped with various stuff last week.
I started looking at your branch on Github, after rebasing it on latest
master. It looks quite good! I will continue experimenting with it this
week, so far I had a couple comments (of course, anybody reading an
Hi Aaron,
This looks great! I will look at it in details over the next few days.
For Gerrit, the idea is to push to a special "refs/for/*" branch. The
Gerrit daemon on the server listens for anything pushed to these
branches, and will create a corresponding review on the website. For
example, pu
Hi Alexandre (and others),
I am picking up a discussion we were having a month ago or so about
contributing the data driven state provider stuff that I have been working on.
Even based on changes that I just saw in master (the "partial history"
support), it seems clear that there is some synch