Re: [linuxtools-dev] CTF timestamps in big endian

2012-09-14 Thread Gerlando Falauto
On 09/14/2012 07:19 PM, Alexandre Montplaisir wrote: We should release a 1.1.1 for the Juno SR1 maintenance release pretty soon. After that there should be be a 1.2 some time around November. Then 2.0 next June for Eclipse Kepler. If you want to try the latest development version without having

Re: [linuxtools-dev] CTF timestamps in big endian

2012-09-14 Thread Alexandre Montplaisir
> > > That > > one has TMF/LTTng, but doesn't have PDE installed by default. The above > > guide mentions Eclipse Classic, but I'll edit it to make it more clear > > you actually need PDE. > > I guess there's one other (maybe) non-obvious point missing: once you > get the whole thing to work with

Re: [linuxtools-dev] CTF timestamps in big endian

2012-09-14 Thread Gerlando Falauto
On 09/14/2012 05:22 PM, Alexandre Montplaisir wrote: On 12-09-14 11:06 AM, Gerlando Falauto wrote: Hi Alexandre, On 09/03/2012 09:49 PM, Alexandre Montplaisir wrote: On 12-09-03 05:02 AM, Gerlando Falauto wrote: P.S. If you could provide some pointers on how to patch/upgrade the tools (to me

Re: [linuxtools-dev] CTF timestamps in big endian

2012-09-14 Thread Alexandre Montplaisir
On 12-09-14 11:06 AM, Gerlando Falauto wrote: > Hi Alexandre, > On 09/03/2012 09:49 PM, Alexandre Montplaisir wrote: >> On 12-09-03 05:02 AM, Gerlando Falauto wrote: >>> >>> >>> P.S. If you could provide some pointers on how to patch/upgrade the >>> tools (to me this whole Eclipse world looks as co

Re: [linuxtools-dev] CTF timestamps in big endian

2012-09-14 Thread Gerlando Falauto
Hi Alexandre, On 09/03/2012 09:49 PM, Alexandre Montplaisir wrote: On 12-09-03 05:02 AM, Gerlando Falauto wrote: P.S. If you could provide some pointers on how to patch/upgrade the tools (to me this whole Eclipse world looks as complicated as a galaxy!), I would really appreciate it! :-) You

Re: [linuxtools-dev] CTF timestamps in big endian

2012-09-13 Thread Alexandre Montplaisir
On 12-09-06 04:41 PM, Matthew Khouzam wrote: > I found the bug. The integers default to LE if it's not specified in its > own scope. I have to modify the parser core... Wish me luck. ;) Just to give some follow-up, I tested Matthew latest patch today and it seemed to fix the big-endian timestamp r

Re: [linuxtools-dev] CTF timestamps in big endian

2012-09-06 Thread Matthew Khouzam
This is a preliminary proof of concept... that bug ran deep. On 12-08-30 12:27 PM, Gerlando Falauto wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I am trying to use the stock LTTng plugin that came with the Eclipse IDE > for C/C++ Developers, Juno (version number looks like > 1.0.0.201206130106) in order to view Ker

Re: [linuxtools-dev] CTF timestamps in big endian

2012-09-06 Thread Matthew Khouzam
I found the bug. The integers default to LE if it's not specified in its own scope. I have to modify the parser core... Wish me luck. ;) On 12-09-03 05:02 AM, Gerlando Falauto wrote: > On 08/31/2012 04:17 PM, Matthew Khouzam wrote: >> On 12-08-30 12:27 PM, Gerlando Falauto wrote: >>> Hi everyone,

Re: [linuxtools-dev] CTF timestamps in big endian

2012-09-03 Thread Alexandre Montplaisir
On 12-09-03 05:02 AM, Gerlando Falauto wrote: > > > P.S. If you could provide some pointers on how to patch/upgrade the > tools (to me this whole Eclipse world looks as complicated as a > galaxy!), I would really appreciate it! :-) You can use the following procedure to get the latest version of t

Re: [linuxtools-dev] CTF timestamps in big endian

2012-09-03 Thread Gerlando Falauto
On 08/31/2012 04:17 PM, Matthew Khouzam wrote: On 12-08-30 12:27 PM, Gerlando Falauto wrote: Hi everyone, I am trying to use the stock LTTng plugin that came with the Eclipse IDE for C/C++ Developers, Juno (version number looks like 1.0.0.201206130106) in order to view Kernel CTF traces genera

Re: [linuxtools-dev] CTF timestamps in big endian

2012-08-31 Thread Matthew Khouzam
On 12-08-30 12:27 PM, Gerlando Falauto wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I am trying to use the stock LTTng plugin that came with the Eclipse IDE > for C/C++ Developers, Juno (version number looks like > 1.0.0.201206130106) in order to view Kernel CTF traces generated by > LTTng 2.0 on two different em