On 10/06/2011 11:30 AM, Alexander Kurtakov wrote:
On 18:23:55 Thursday 06 October 2011 sami wagiaalla wrote:
On 10/05/2011 09:49 AM, akurtakov wrote:
Shouldn't we build later milestone?
Yup, I'll tackle M2 soon.
This work will be reused for 3.7.1,
at least the git fetch part.
Sounds good.
On 18:23:55 Thursday 06 October 2011 sami wagiaalla wrote:
> On 10/05/2011 09:49 AM, akurtakov wrote:
> > Shouldn't we build later milestone?
>
> Yup, I'll tackle M2 soon.
>
> > This work will be reused for 3.7.1,
> > at least the git fetch part.
>
> Sounds good. We can use the eclipse37 branch
On 10/05/2011 09:49 AM, akurtakov wrote:
Shouldn't we build later milestone?
Yup, I'll tackle M2 soon.
This work will be reused for 3.7.1,
at least the git fetch part.
Sounds good. We can use the eclipse37 branch for that and cherry pick
everything that is needed over. If all or most of t
Shouldn't we build later milestone? This work will be reused for 3.7.1, at
least the git fetch part.
On Oct 5, 2011 4:45 PM, "sami wagiaalla" wrote:
> On 10/04/2011 02:16 PM, sami wagiaalla wrote:
>>
>>> Unless there are objections, I would like to put the work on building
>>> Eclipse 4.2 currentl
On 10/04/2011 02:16 PM, sami wagiaalla wrote:
Unless there are objections, I would like to put the work on building
Eclipse 4.2 currently on branch eclipse42 on master (I still have to
figure out the git incantation fro this :)).
Executing.
This is done. Please let me know if there is any
Unless there are objections, I would like to put the work on building
Eclipse 4.2 currently on branch eclipse42 on master (I still have to
figure out the git incantation fro this :)).
Executing.
Sami
___
linuxtools-dev mailing list
linuxtools-dev
> Unless there are objections, I would like to put the work on
> building Eclipse 4.2 currently on branch eclipse42 on master (I
> still have to figure out the git incantation fro this :)).
>
> All 3.7 work should therefore go on the stable eclipse37 branch.
+1
Andrew
___
