Re: [linuxtools-dev] Parsing c++ doxygen comments.

2011-05-16 Thread Germán Diago
> While the libstdc++ libhover support is based upon doxygen comments in the > libstdc++ code, this is done far in advance.  A parser is run on the > libstdc++ doxygen documentation output to create a binary which is just a > serialized version of the libhover Java classes that make look-up quick.

Re: [linuxtools-dev] Parsing c++ doxygen comments.

2011-05-06 Thread Jeff Johnston
Hi German, The current libhover design is not a dynamic one. While the libstdc++ libhover support is based upon doxygen comments in the libstdc++ code, this is done far in advance. A parser is run on the libstdc++ doxygen documentation output to create a binary which is just a serialized ve

Re: [linuxtools-dev] Parsing c++ doxygen comments.

2011-05-01 Thread Germán Diago
Thank you. It also helped. But what I mean by parser is a tool that parses doxygen comments and makes the function information available as it is done with libhover for C in linuxtools. What is the status of that feature? Thanks in advance. 2011/4/30 Alexander Kurtakov : > On 05:35:35 PM Saturday

Re: [linuxtools-dev] Parsing c++ doxygen comments.

2011-04-30 Thread Alexander Kurtakov
On 05:35:35 PM Saturday, April 30, 2011 Germán Diago wrote: > Hello. > > I've been using eclipse linuxtools for a while and I think that you're > all doing a great work > with valgrind, oprofile, etc. > > I would like to ask you when c++ doxygen comments parsing will be > available. It's a featur