Re: [linuxtools-dev] Proposal: Update to Git branching policy

2012-01-03 Thread sami wagiaalla
1.) Keep existing stable naming scheme 2.) Decide a few simple rules for "namespacing" experimental/feature work Does that sound right? Hi Severin, I saw the updates you have made to the guide lines. I have some more thoughts now that Jeff has created a branch using these guidelines.

Re: [linuxtools-dev] Proposal: Update to Git branching policy

2011-12-08 Thread Andrew Overholt
> 1.) Keep existing stable naming scheme > 2.) Decide a few simple rules for "namespacing" experimental/feature > work > > Does that sound right? Sounds great. And put it here: http://wiki.eclipse.org/Linux_Tools_Project/Git Andrew ___ linuxtoo

Re: [linuxtools-dev] Proposal: Update to Git branching policy

2011-12-08 Thread Severin Gehwolf
- Original Message - > > >> Thanks for proposing this, Severin. In general I like it. My > >> only > >> concern is the difference between features and tags for releases. > >> Will > >> people be confused by released/{stable-,}0.9 being the maintenance > >> branch for 0.9 micro releases?

Re: [linuxtools-dev] Proposal: Update to Git branching policy

2011-12-02 Thread sami wagiaalla
Thanks for proposing this, Severin. In general I like it. My only concern is the difference between features and tags for releases. Will people be confused by released/{stable-,}0.9 being the maintenance branch for 0.9 micro releases? [...] Having said that, keeping "stable-x" branches an

Re: [linuxtools-dev] Proposal: Update to Git branching policy

2011-12-01 Thread Andrew Overholt
* Severin Gehwolf [2011-11-16 09:34]: > On Mon, 2011-11-14 at 09:29 -0500, Andrew Overholt wrote: > > * Severin Gehwolf [2011-11-09 10:13]: > > > 2. Name-space maintenance branches with prefix "released/" > > [...] > > > My only concern is the difference between features and tags for > > r

Re: [linuxtools-dev] Proposal: Update to Git branching policy

2011-11-16 Thread Severin Gehwolf
On Mon, 2011-11-14 at 09:29 -0500, Andrew Overholt wrote: > Hi, > > * Severin Gehwolf [2011-11-09 10:13]: > > 2. Name-space maintenance branches with prefix "released/" > > > > [...] > > > > What do you think? > > Thanks for proposing this, Severin. In general I like it. My only > conce

Re: [linuxtools-dev] Proposal: Update to Git branching policy

2011-11-14 Thread Andrew Overholt
Hi, * Severin Gehwolf [2011-11-09 10:13]: > 2. Name-space maintenance branches with prefix "released/" > > [...] > > What do you think? Thanks for proposing this, Severin. In general I like it. My only concern is the difference between features and tags for releases. Will people be con

Re: [linuxtools-dev] Proposal: Update to Git branching policy

2011-11-10 Thread Severin Gehwolf
- Original Message - > > > > 1. Branch "master" remains the main development tree. > > 2. Name-space maintenance branches with prefix "released/" > > 3. Name-space shared feature branches with prefix "features/" > > > The benefits of this would be to encourage collaboratio

Re: [linuxtools-dev] Proposal: Update to Git branching policy

2011-11-10 Thread Roland Grunberg
> > 1. Branch "master" remains the main development tree. > 2. Name-space maintenance branches with prefix "released/" > 3. Name-space shared feature branches with prefix "features/" > The benefits of this would be to encourage collaboration on > experimental > features and make t