ndbox/job/linuxtools-sonar/
>
> Alexander Kurtakov
> Red Hat Eclipse team
>
> - Original Message -
>> From: "Bernd Hufmann"
>> To: "Linux Tools developer discussions"
>> Sent: Monday, November 12, 2012 11:05:59 PM
>> Subject: Re: [linuxtools
/sandbox/job/linuxtools-sonar/
Alexander Kurtakov
Red Hat Eclipse team
- Original Message -
> From: "Bernd Hufmann"
> To: "Linux Tools developer discussions"
> Sent: Monday, November 12, 2012 11:05:59 PM
> Subject: Re: [linuxtools-dev] Sonar configured for
- Original Message -
> It only means that the matching java packages are not analysed by
> Sonar. For example, no code violations (e.g findbugs) are reported in
> Sonar for the matching packages. I prefer to have violation reports,
> code coverage report and other reports only for the deliv
Hi Alex
see my answer below.
Thanks
Bernd
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 11:05 AM, akurtakov wrote:
> Hi Bernd,
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 5:58 PM, Bernd Hufmann wrote:
>>
>> Hi Alexander
>>
>> I'm happy to see that Eclipse is now using Sonar and the Linux Tools
>> project is using it, too. It's a
Hi Bernd,
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 5:58 PM, Bernd Hufmann wrote:
> Hi Alexander
>
> I'm happy to see that Eclipse is now using Sonar and the Linux Tools
> project is using it, too. It's a great tool to statically analyse the
> quality of the source code. We (LTTng guys) have been using Sonar
> i
Hi Alexander
I'm happy to see that Eclipse is now using Sonar and the Linux Tools
project is using it, too. It's a great tool to statically analyse the
quality of the source code. We (LTTng guys) have been using Sonar
internally for a while and I was responsible for the setup.
I noticed in the So
