On 14-02-20 10:52 AM, Geneviève Bastien wrote:
>
>
> * The LTTng UST Memory usage analysis is a more tricky (and
> interesting!) case: It has events. Adding the context TID and procname
> will give a more interesting analysis, but the analysis can still do
> something without it.
That's interestin
>>
>> Some questions:
>> - A "string" requirement is quite generic. What actual types of
>> requirements do you have in mind? I can see event type (or event name),
>> but what else? If we can pinpoint a few specific types of requirements,
>> we could have a couple of methods specifically for those
Hi Guilliano,
Thanks! I'll add your contribution so far on gerrit to be able to better
appreciate it and review it.
On 02/20/2014 10:11 AM, Guilliano Molaire wrote:
Hi Alex,
On 19/02/2014 4:45 PM, Alexandre Montplaisir wrote:
Hi Guilliano,
Interesting project! Indeed, there is already an A
Hi Alex,
On 19/02/2014 4:45 PM, Alexandre Montplaisir wrote:
Hi Guilliano,
Interesting project! Indeed, there is already an API for traces to
indicate if they contain specific events (hasEvent(String),
hasAllEvents(String[]),...).[1] The next step would be to have a way
for an analysis to spec
Hi Guilliano,
Interesting project! Indeed, there is already an API for traces to
indicate if they contain specific events (hasEvent(String),
hasAllEvents(String[]),...).[1] The next step would be to have a way
for an analysis to specify which event types they need, so we can match
the traces and
