[linuxtools-dev] Hudson build is back to stable : linuxtools-Indigo #424

2012-03-22 Thread hudsonbuild
See ___ linuxtools-dev mailing list linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev

Re: [linuxtools-dev] Linux Tools 0.10.0 release

2012-03-22 Thread Otávio Pontes
The tag v0.10.0 was created. And it is pointing the commit: 74cab85957757f128f8914b2b6e3e484e7d4e7ea. ___ linuxtools-dev mailing list linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev

[linuxtools-dev] Master freeze over

2012-03-22 Thread Jeff Johnston
The freeze to master repository is over. -- Jeff J. ___ linuxtools-dev mailing list linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev

Re: [linuxtools-dev] API for 1.0

2012-03-22 Thread John Arthorne
Andrew Overholt wrote on 03/21/2012 02:25:42 PM: > Please take a look at the Javadocs for our nightly build: > > https://hudson.eclipse.org/hudson/job/linuxtools-master/javadoc/ > > There is still a *lot* of API exposed. If that's intention, great, but > if not, we need to fix it ASAP. >From

Re: [linuxtools-dev] API for 1.0

2012-03-22 Thread Aleksandar Kurtakov
- Original Message - > From: "John Arthorne" > To: "Andrew Overholt" , "Linux Tools developer > discussions" > Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2012 8:48:33 PM > Subject: Re: [linuxtools-dev] API for 1.0 > > > Andrew Overholt wrote on 03/21/2012 02:25:42 PM: > > Please take a look at the Ja

Re: [linuxtools-dev] API for 1.0

2012-03-22 Thread Aleksandar Kurtakov
Oh, and one more thing. Please cd into your subproject and run mvn javadoc:aggregate. This will print out a number of lines like: [WARNING] /home/akurtakov/git/org.eclipse.linuxtools/lttng/org.eclipse.linuxtools.tmf.core.tests/stubs/org/eclipse/linuxtools/tmf/stubs/request/TmfEventRequestStub.jav

Re: [linuxtools-dev] API for 1.0

2012-03-22 Thread John Arthorne
Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote on 03/22/2012 03:22:54 PM: > I fully support the all-internal approach and after doing that to > the man-page and rpmstubby projects they have two exported classes > each. In the rpmstubby case it even led to simplifying/unifying the codebase. > But I think that we sho

[linuxtools-dev] Hudson build became unstable: linuxtools-master #762

2012-03-22 Thread hudsonbuild
See ___ linuxtools-dev mailing list linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev