Re: [linuxtools-dev] API for 1.0

2012-03-26 Thread sami wagiaalla
If you don't want to sign for something being an API please move it to org.eclipse.linuxtools.internal. packages. I have done this for o.e.l.rpm*. I'll start pushing the patches one at a time shortly. ___ linuxtools-dev mailing list linuxtools-d

Re: [linuxtools-dev] API for 1.0

2012-03-26 Thread akurtakov
Sami, Have you seen my changes? Please do not push things that can break fedorapackager functionality. Alex On Mar 26, 2012 9:55 AM, "sami wagiaalla" wrote: > > > If you don't want to sign for something being an API please move it to >> org.eclipse.linuxtools.**internal. packages. >> > > I hav

Re: [linuxtools-dev] API for 1.0

2012-03-26 Thread Andrew Overholt
* sami wagiaalla [2012-03-26 09:55]: > > > >If you don't want to sign for something being an API please move it to > >org.eclipse.linuxtools.internal. packages. > > I have done this for o.e.l.rpm*. I'll start pushing the patches one > at a time shortly. There are consumers of that API (Fedor

Re: [linuxtools-dev] API for 1.0

2012-03-26 Thread sami wagiaalla
On 03/26/2012 09:59 AM, Andrew Overholt wrote: * sami wagiaalla [2012-03-26 09:55]: If you don't want to sign for something being an API please move it to org.eclipse.linuxtools.internal. packages. I have done this for o.e.l.rpm*. I'll start pushing the patches one at a time shortly.

[linuxtools-dev] Hudson build became unstable: linuxtools-master #770

2012-03-26 Thread hudsonbuild
See ___ linuxtools-dev mailing list linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev

[linuxtools-dev] Hudson build is still unstable: linuxtools-master #771

2012-03-26 Thread hudsonbuild
See ___ linuxtools-dev mailing list linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev