Hi,
I've a question about valgrind integration.
I would like to open cachegrind files in post-mortem. (The best will be
to open them with a simple double-click).
Is it currently possible ?
Xavier Raynaud
___
linuxtools-dev mailing list
linuxtools-de
> I would like to open cachegrind files in post-mortem.
Most of the workflows we've targetted in the past were not for post
mortem analysis but for as-you-develop type of analysis. That being
said, I can't speak to the cachegrind case.
Andrew
___
linux
On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 10:33 +0200, Xavier Raynaud wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've a question about valgrind integration.
> I would like to open cachegrind files in post-mortem. (The best will be
> to open them with a simple double-click).
>
> Is it currently possible ?
I don't think so. In the way Valgri
> One way to make it work would be creating a separated view, like
> "post-mortem Cachegrind analysis", where you have freedom to open any
> cachegrind file (even if it's unrelated to any C/C++ project you have
> on
> the workspace).
Agreed, the linking to source files is such a benefit IMO that i
technology.linux-distros Committers,
This automatically generated message marks the PMC's approval of the vote
for Matthew Khouzam's full Committer status on the technology.linux-distros
project. The next step is for the project lead to return to the portal and
fill in the VCS package and employer
> -Original Message-
> From: linuxtools-dev-boun...@eclipse.org
> [mailto:linuxtools-dev-boun...@eclipse.org] On Behalf Of Daniel HB
> Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2012 8:57 AM
> To: linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org
> Subject: Re: [linuxtools-dev] cachegrind
>
> On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 10:33 +0200,
On 04/24/2012 04:12 PM, Marc Khouzam wrote:
[...]
I've been asked multiple times about post-mortem support for the
LinuxTools. The main use case in question was to be able to visualize
results taken on a remote target than cannot run Eclipse.
Ultimately, supporting LinuxTools running remotely is
> >I've been asked multiple times about post-mortem support for the
> >LinuxTools.
>
> I personaly think that it's useful in all cases.
I agree it's very useful and would love to see us support it. It just
wasn't part of the original workflows of a lot of the plugins we have.
Maybe a good gener
> -Original Message-
> From: linuxtools-dev-boun...@eclipse.org
> [mailto:linuxtools-dev-boun...@eclipse.org] On Behalf Of
> Andrew Overholt
> Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2012 10:45 AM
> To: Linux Tools developer discussions
> Subject: Re: [linuxtools-dev] cachegrind
>
> > >I've been asked
On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 10:45 -0400, Andrew Overholt wrote:
> > >I've been asked multiple times about post-mortem support for the
> > >LinuxTools.
> >
> > I personaly think that it's useful in all cases.
>
> I agree it's very useful and would love to see us support it. It just
> wasn't part of the
> -Original Message-
> From: linuxtools-dev-boun...@eclipse.org
> [mailto:linuxtools-dev-boun...@eclipse.org] On Behalf Of Daniel HB
> Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2012 11:06 AM
> To: Linux Tools developer discussions
> Subject: Re: [linuxtools-dev] cachegrind
>
> On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 10:45
* Daniel HB [2012-04-24 11:06]:
> On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 10:45 -0400, Andrew Overholt wrote:
> > > >I've been asked multiple times about post-mortem support for the
> > > >LinuxTools.
> > >
> > > I personaly think that it's useful in all cases.
> >
> > I agree it's very useful and would love to s
On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 11:14 -0400, Andrew Overholt wrote:
> * Daniel HB [2012-04-24 11:06]:
> > On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 10:45 -0400, Andrew Overholt wrote:
> > > > >I've been asked multiple times about post-mortem support for the
> > > > >LinuxTools.
> > > >
> > > > I personaly think that it's usef
On 04/24/2012 12:21 PM, Daniel HB wrote:
On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 11:14 -0400, Andrew Overholt wrote:
* Daniel HB [2012-04-24 11:06]:
On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 10:45 -0400, Andrew Overholt wrote:
I've been asked multiple times about post-mortem support for the
LinuxTools.
I personaly think that it'
On 04/24/2012 11:39 AM, Xavier Raynaud wrote:
On 04/24/2012 04:12 PM, Marc Khouzam wrote:
[...]
I've been asked multiple times about post-mortem support for the
LinuxTools. The main use case in question was to be able to visualize
results taken on a remote target than cannot run Eclipse.
Ultima
> Just a head's up: Oprofile plug-in has such as "save & compare"
> feature
> implemented. It is really useful to compare runs when you have just
> changed source code.
>
> For Oprofile feature, you may take a look at
> http://linorg.usp.br/eclipse/technology/linuxtools/videos/eclipse-oprofile-dem
> For Oprofile feature, you may take a look at
> http://linorg.usp.br/eclipse/technology/linuxtools/videos/eclipse-oprofile-demo.ogg
> demo video (see 1:36'' and then 2:45'').
FWIW these (somewhat old now) screencasts are linked from our downloads
page:
http://www.eclipse.org/linuxtools/downlo
On 04/24/2012 05:11 PM, Marc Khouzam wrote:
[...]
Maybe simpler is better?
How about a view menu item: "Open..." which allows you to choose
the file you want to open. Maybe also specify a binary or such other
things for the cases that need them.
+1
X
_
On 04/24/2012 04:45 PM, Andrew Overholt wrote:
I've been asked multiple times about post-mortem support for the
LinuxTools.
I personaly think that it's useful in all cases.
I agree it's very useful and would love to see us support it. It just
wasn't part of the original workflows of a lot of
technology.linux-distros Committers,
This automatically generated message marks the successful completion of
voting for Alexandre Montplaisir to receive full Committer status on the
technology.linux-distros project. The next step is for the PMC to approve
this vote, followed by the EMO processing t
technology.linux-distros Committers,
This automatically generated message marks the PMC's approval of the vote
for Alexandre Montplaisir's full Committer status on the
technology.linux-distros project. The next step is for the project lead to
return to the portal and fill in the VCS package and emp
21 matches
Mail list logo
