[linuxtools-dev] [TMF] Advanced statistics view

Hello all, I have some questions about the current state of the statistics viewer inside TMF. Recent developments have integrated the state system to the statistics view in order to speed up the queries. At the moment, the information stored in this state system consists solely of raw event count

[linuxtools-dev] Recent build failures on Gerrit: Hudson doesn't have internet access anymore?

Hi all, You might have noticed that all recent patches on Gerrit fail to build. After some digging the all seem to fail while downloading test traces from lttng.org: [INFO] Executing tasks [echo] prepare phase [get] Getting: http://lttng.org/files/samples/sample-ctf-trace-20120412.tar

Re: [linuxtools-dev] Recent build failures on Gerrit: Hudson doesn't have internet access anymore?

Please open a bug against eclipse.org to get response from webmaster. Alexander Kurtakov On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 8:03 PM, Alexandre Montplaisir < alexmon...@voxpopuli.im> wrote: > Hi all, > > You might have noticed that all recent patches on Gerrit fail to build. > After some digging the all se

Re: [linuxtools-dev] Recent build failures on Gerrit: Hudson doesn't have internet access anymore?

> However the lttng.org website is up, and the file still exists. We > had > this procedure going for a couple weeks already and it was working > fine. > Could it be possible that with the recent server move, the build > server > does not have access to the internet anymore? It would still need in

Re: [linuxtools-dev] Recent build failures on Gerrit: Hudson doesn't have internet access anymore?

On 13-02-11 01:17 PM, Roland Grunberg wrote: >> However the lttng.org website is up, and the file still exists. We >> had >> this procedure going for a couple weeks already and it was working >> fine. >> Could it be possible that with the recent server move, the build >> server >> does not have acc

[linuxtools-dev] LTTng/TMF live trace streaming support plan?

Hi all, I have a use case where I have a channel of events that come in dynamically in a proprietary format in XML. For a proof of concept I created an adapter that munged this data to log files, and then I imported the log files into a TMF derived trace. This works OK, but this is NOT what I

Re: [linuxtools-dev] [TMF] Advanced statistics view

> The structure could look like this : > > Process #1 : 25% total > -> CPU0 : 20% > -> CPU1 : 5% I suppose that you first need to compute the CPU usage per process while building the state history, summing it up each time it is scheduled out. The usage up to t0 then becomes the sum at t0 (

Re: [linuxtools-dev] LTTng/TMF live trace streaming support plan?

Hi Aaron, On 13-02-11 04:09 PM, Aaron Spear wrote: > Hi all, > > I have a use case where I have a channel of events that come in dynamically > in a proprietary format in XML. For a proof of concept I created an adapter > that munged this data to log files, and then I imported the log files into

Re: [linuxtools-dev] [TMF] Advanced statistics view

Hi François, This would indeed be a nice addition. It would require storing more data in the state system compared to what we have now (and I'm not sure if it would "partializable", probably but we would have to check for corner cases). We did an experiment about this a couple weeks back, it's a

Re: [linuxtools-dev] [TMF] Advanced statistics view

Some other considerations that came to mind after writing the whole thing: 1 - In fact that state history would NOT be storable in a partial history (aka "partializable"). The partial history only gives us the values at the queried times, not the whole intervals. It can give us the start time, but

[linuxtools-dev] [Hudson] Hudson build became unstable: linuxtools-master #1269

See -- This message is automatically generated by Hudson. For more information on Hudson, see: http://hudson-ci.org/ ___ linuxtools-dev mailing list linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org https

Re: [linuxtools-dev] LTTng/TMF live trace streaming support plan?

Hi Alexandre, Thanks for the helpful info, some more dialogue below: > Since LTTng is our reference implementation, our plan was to wait until > live-reading was supported in LTTng itself (at least in beta form) > before starting to work on supporting it in TMF. From what I hear, > live-reading w

[linuxtools-dev] [Hudson] Hudson build is still unstable: linuxtools-master #1270

See -- This message is automatically generated by Hudson. For more information on Hudson, see: http://hudson-ci.org/ ___ linuxtools-dev mailing list linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org https://de

[linuxtools-dev] Lttng tests breaking nightlies/sonar

What's going on there? Is it just a temporary failure or smth not expected to be fixed in a day? If the later please disable the tests in question until they are fixed. Alexander Kurtakov Red Hat Eclipse team ___ linuxtools-dev mailing list linuxtools