Re: [linuxtools-dev] Dataviewers Feature

2014-04-08 Thread Aleksandar Kurtakov
I saw the problem now. We were missing the dataviewers in the nightly update site but when testing it was satisfied by older luna contributions. I reverted the commit removing the feature. Alexander Kurtakov Red Hat Eclipse team - Original Message - > From: "Aleksandar Kurtakov" > To:

[linuxtools-dev] Gerrit forward only

2014-04-08 Thread Aleksandar Kurtakov
Hi everyone, What do you think of switching our gerrit configuration from cherry-pick to forward only ? This would remove the need for resetting your local clone after every review pushed and/or later merge/reset. It will not introduce any major drawback in my opinion but I would like to hear o

[linuxtools-dev] [Hudson] Build failed in Hudson: master-java8 #7

2014-04-08 Thread hudsonbuild
See Changes: [Alexander Kurtakov] Revert "Remove dataviewers feature." [Alexander Kurtakov] Extend JFace LabelProvider instead of implementing ILabelProvider. [Alexander Kurtakov] perf: Fix recentlry introduced warnings. [Alex

Re: [linuxtools-dev] Gerrit forward only

2014-04-08 Thread Roland Grunberg
> Hi everyone, > What do you think of switching our gerrit configuration from cherry-pick to > forward only ? This would remove the need for resetting your local clone > after every review pushed and/or later merge/reset. It will not introduce > any major drawback in my opinion but I would like to

Re: [linuxtools-dev] Gerrit forward only

2014-04-08 Thread Marc Khouzam
> -Original Message- > From: linuxtools-dev-boun...@eclipse.org [mailto:linuxtools-dev- > boun...@eclipse.org] On Behalf Of Roland Grunberg > Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2014 9:55 AM > To: Linux Tools developer discussions > Subject: Re: [linuxtools-dev] Gerrit forward only > > > Hi everyone,

Re: [linuxtools-dev] Gerrit forward only

2014-04-08 Thread Alexandre Montplaisir
On 04/08/2014 04:11 AM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote: Hi everyone, What do you think of switching our gerrit configuration from cherry-pick to forward only ? This would remove the need for resetting your local clone after every review pushed and/or later merge/reset. It will not introduce any maj

Re: [linuxtools-dev] Tracing TMF for debugging

2014-04-08 Thread Bernd Hufmann
Hi Francis If you import the attached custom text parser into TMF then you can load the traces (generated by TmfCoreTracer) into TMF and analyze them with TMF. See integrated LTTng User Guide chapter "Custom Parsers" on how to import and manage custom parsers. /Bernd On 04/07/2014 05:02 PM,

[linuxtools-dev] [Hudson] Build failed in Hudson: master-java8 #8

2014-04-08 Thread hudsonbuild
See Changes: [Alexander Kurtakov] systemtap: Axe useless old code. [Alexander Kurtakov] systemtap: Remove unused method parameters. [Patrick Tasse] tmf: Bug 424964: Drag and dropping a linked trace doesn't create a link [Patri

Re: [linuxtools-dev] [Hudson] Build failed in Hudson: master-java8 #5

2014-04-08 Thread Marc-André Laperle
It seems relates to this: "In previous releases, some implementations of Collection.removeAll(Collection) and retainAll(Collection) would silently ignore a null parameter if the collection itself was empty. As of this release, collections will consistently throw a NullPointerException if null is pr

Re: [linuxtools-dev] Tracing TMF for debugging

2014-04-08 Thread Francis Giraldeau
Thanks, it's good to know, it was hidden in plain sight! I will update the corresponding wiki pages accordingly. Cheers, Francis 2014-04-08 12:08 GMT-04:00 Bernd Hufmann : > Hi Francis > > If you import the attached custom text parser into TMF then you can load > the traces (generated by TmfC

[linuxtools-dev] [Hudson] Build failed in Hudson: master-java8 #9

2014-04-08 Thread hudsonbuild
See Changes: [Patrick Tasse] tmf: Refactor bookmarks file handling [Alexander Kurtakov] systemtap: Removed unudse methods. -- [...truncated 12847 lines...] at org.apache.maven.cli.

[linuxtools-dev] 2.2.1 source tarball download url points to "2.2.0" named tarball

2014-04-08 Thread Tony Jones
http://download.eclipse.org/linuxtools/2.2.1-sources/ The link on this page points to: http://www.eclipse.org/downloads/download.php?file=/linuxtools/2.2.1-sources/org.eclipse.linuxtools-2.2.0.tar.bz2 I've not tried to download it and see if it actually contains 2.2.1, also if I instead downlo

Re: [linuxtools-dev] 2.2.1 source tarball download url points to "2.2.0" named tarball

2014-04-08 Thread Aleksandar Kurtakov
I would recommend getting the tarball from cgit. http://git.eclipse.org/c/linuxtools/org.eclipse.linuxtools.git/snapshot/org.eclipse.linuxtools-2.2.1.tar.bz2 For the last few releases we were coping it to downloads area for "compat" reasons and the 2.2.1-sources is purely a mistake so I removed