Re: [linuxtools-dev] Branching strategy for Luna

2014-05-26 Thread Marc-André Laperle
I am very much in favor of having the master branch be the "unstable" Mars branch. It think it makes sense to have master always going and branch off the more stable branches from it. That way, development that includes major changes (API breaking) is not stalled. I was thinking we could do someth

[linuxtools-dev] stable-3.0 branch created

2014-05-26 Thread Jeff Johnston
Please be advised that I have created the stable-3.0 branch. Any subsequent changes meant for Luna RC2, RC3, or RC4 should be cherry-picked from master. Please update your remotes to add a gerrit instance for stable-3.0. -- Jeff J. ___ linuxtools-dev

Re: [linuxtools-dev] stable-3.0 branch created

2014-05-26 Thread Patrick Tasse
Hi Jeff, I'm unable to push to the stable-3.0 branch. remote: error: insufficient permission for adding an object to repository database ./objects Patrick On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Jeff Johnston wrote: > Please be advised that I have created the stable-3.0 branch. Any > subsequent >

Re: [linuxtools-dev] stable-3.0 branch created

2014-05-26 Thread Jeff Johnston
By any chance did you try pushing directly to the branch? You need to push to a gerrit remote which specifies that branch as the target: [remote "review-3.0"] url = ssh://jjohns...@git.eclipse.org:29418/linuxtools/org.eclipse.linuxtools.git push = HEAD:refs/for/stable-3.0

Re: [linuxtools-dev] stable-3.0 branch created

2014-05-26 Thread Matthew Khouzam
Cool! so now can we use @since 3.1 in code and @since 4.0? On 14-05-26 12:06 PM, Jeff Johnston wrote: > Please be advised that I have created the stable-3.0 branch. Any subsequent > changes meant for Luna RC2, RC3, or RC4 should be cherry-picked from master. > Please > update your remotes to a

Re: [linuxtools-dev] Branching strategy for Luna

2014-05-26 Thread Jeff Johnston
The stable-3.0 branch has been created. Basically, a new branch is created around RC1 time so we can ensure people aren't jamming new features into the build. I have requested a new Hudson job for building this new branch. Whether we put API-breaking stuff into master usually has depended on ho

Re: [linuxtools-dev] stable-3.0 branch created

2014-05-26 Thread Jeff Johnston
As soon as I have the new Hudson job working, yes. So hold off a bit. -- Jeff J. - Original Message - From: "Matthew Khouzam" To: linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org Sent: Monday, May 26, 2014 3:48:37 PM Subject: Re: [linuxtools-dev] stable-3.0 branch created Cool! so now can we use @since 3.1

Re: [linuxtools-dev] stable-3.0 branch created

2014-05-26 Thread Patrick Tasse
Hi Jeff, We were hoping to be able to push without review patches that have been cherry-picked from a patch that was already reviewed on master branch. Is it OK to push through the gerrit remote with HEAD:refs/heads/stable-3.0? By the way is it only the stable-3.0 branch that doesn't allow pushin