[linuxtools-dev] ASM 8 or 9?

2020-11-25 Thread Jonah Graham
Hello Linux tools folks, I have been continuing to unravel dependencies, especially about version constraints. Most of my work has been on JAXB because some uses cases of JAXB is failing since 2020-06. While doing so I came across another case which only affects Linuxtools' docker support. At th

Re: [linuxtools-dev] ASM 8 or 9?

2020-11-25 Thread Jeff Johnston
The orbit repo for Linux Tools wasn't updated since M1, but that was an oversight. We can update for RC1 to use the latest and greatest orbit (RC1). If there are issues and we have to back-level any packages, I'll post here. -- Jeff J. On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 3:49 PM Jonah Graham wrote: > He

Re: [linuxtools-dev] ASM 8 or 9?

2020-11-25 Thread Jonah Graham
Because of changes in simrel (Orbit p2 repo is directly available to simrel[1]) ASM 9 is being used by Linuxtools for 2020-12 M3 simrel and EPP, but ASM 8 is being used if you install linuxtools outside of Simrel. If ASM9 does not work, changing Linuxtools target platform alone won't change what e

Re: [linuxtools-dev] ASM 8 or 9?

2020-11-25 Thread Jeff Johnston
I have switched Linux Tools target to use the RC1 Orbit repo and to specify the 9.0.0 versions of objectweb.asm. It was specifying 8.1.0 for M3. Looking at a local build repository, there are only objectweb.asm 9.0.0 plug-ins. Docker Tooling is working in my testing. Is there something else nee

Re: [linuxtools-dev] ASM 8 or 9?

2020-11-25 Thread Jonah Graham
That sounds good. Thanks Jeff. Jonah On Wed., Nov. 25, 2020, 21:24 Jeff Johnston, wrote: > > I have switched Linux Tools target to use the RC1 Orbit repo and to > specify the 9.0.0 versions of objectweb.asm. It was > specifying 8.1.0 for M3. Looking at a local build repository, there are > o