[linuxtools-dev] [eclipse-build] problem building eclipse 3.5.2 from source

exec] ../eclipseOS.h:16:17: error: jni.h: No such file or directory [exec] In file included from ../eclipseConfig.c:12: [exec] ../eclipseOS.h:118: error: expected ‘=’, ‘,’, ‘;’, ‘asm’ or ‘__attribute__’ before ‘getSplashHandle’ [exec] make: *** [eclipseConfig.o] Error 1 BUILD FAI

Re: [linuxtools-dev] [eclipse-build] problem building eclipse 3.5.2 from source

On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 3:53 PM, Andrew Overholt wrote: > Hi, > > * Chris Aniszczyk [2010-04-21 16:51]: >>      [exec] swt.h:23:17: error: jni.h: No such file or directory > > export JAVA_HOME=/usr/lib/jvm/java (or wherever) Thanks, that took care of it. I updated the wi

Re: [linuxtools-dev] Supporting nightly updates for previous release

rate about people running on older versions of Eclipse. -- Cheers, Chris Aniszczyk http://aniszczyk.org +1 860 839 2465 ___ linuxtools-dev mailing list linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev

Re: [linuxtools-dev] Supporting nightly updates for previous release

quickly. The incentive for your user base to move up should be high :) There's no easy answer but I think Linux Tools is still in incubation (0.5.1 is out) and deserves to be able to move quickly with each release. -- Cheers, Chris Aniszczyk http://aniszczyk.org +1 860 839 2465 __

Re: [linuxtools-dev] Builds for Helios maintenance and Indigo

ill be an issue when the community will be large enough. You can spin a 0.6.1 ASAP for any immediate fixes for downstream consumers (without a release review needed). -- Cheers, Chris Aniszczyk http://aniszczyk.org +1 860 839 2465 ___ linuxtools-dev mai

Re: [linuxtools-dev] Builds for Helios maintenance and Indigo

dle versions. It could be easier to just spin a 0.6.1 for anything critical now and keep cranking at 0.7.0... if it was me... I would avoid doing the branching... it's a pain... -- Cheers, Chris Aniszczyk http://aniszczyk.org +1 860 839 2465 ___ l

Re: [linuxtools-dev] Versioning plans for Helios SRs and Indigo

any time soon) I'd suggest 2.0 for Indigo+1 to keep things moving forward while you can. Once you have a large enough user base, you'll have to worry more about maintaining branches. Another litmus test is to not do anything unless someone explicitly asks for it. --

Re: [linuxtools-dev] Next release planning

0.8 for Helios SR2 and Indigo respectively. -- Cheers, Chris Aniszczyk http://aniszczyk.org +1 860 839 2465 ___ linuxtools-dev mailing list linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev

Re: [linuxtools-dev] Athena -> Tycho

hitting > the repos each time.  It sounds like they're aware of it and are trying > to find a solution. We could speed up the build by making the findbugs generation optional via a profile. Not sure how much time we would save though... -- Cheers, Chris Aniszczyk h

[linuxtools-dev] [eclipse-build] Eclipse 3.7

round is to get ready early for the new Eclipse release. In the near future, I'm looking at remove our usage of features when we provision things (they aren't really needed) and moving away from dropins. -- Cheers, Chris Aniszczyk http://anis

[linuxtools-dev] [eclipse-build] 3.7.0 Final

I merged the eclipse37 branch into master since the 3.7.0 final is out. I pushed the 3.7.0 source also here... http://download.eclipse.org/technology/linuxtools/eclipse-build/3.7.x_Indigo/ Let me know if you run into issues as Indigo ships next week. -- Cheers, Chris Aniszczyk http

Re: [linuxtools-dev] git tree update mailing list?

a feed... https://github.com/eclipse/linuxtools/commits/master.atom -- Cheers, Chris Aniszczyk http://aniszczyk.org +1 512 961 6719 ___ linuxtools-dev mailing list linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev

[linuxtools-dev] +1 for Sami Wagiaalla on technology.linux-distros by Chris Aniszczyk

Chris Aniszczyk voted: +1 +1, welcome Sami! Voting summary: http://portal.eclipse.org/ ___ linuxtools-dev mailing list linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev

[linuxtools-dev] +1 for Patrick Tasse on technology.linux-distros by Chris Aniszczyk

Chris Aniszczyk voted: +1 Looks good. Voting summary: http://portal.eclipse.org/ ___ linuxtools-dev mailing list linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev

[linuxtools-dev] +1 for Otavio Pontes on technology.linux-distros by Chris Aniszczyk

Chris Aniszczyk voted: +1 Loks good. Voting summary: http://portal.eclipse.org/ ___ linuxtools-dev mailing list linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev

[linuxtools-dev] +1 for Krzysztof Daniel on technology.linux-distros by Chris Aniszczyk

Chris Aniszczyk voted: +1 +1 Voting summary: http://portal.eclipse.org/ ___ linuxtools-dev mailing list linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev

[linuxtools-dev] +1 for Daniel Henrique Barboza on technology.linux-distros by Chris Aniszczyk

Chris Aniszczyk voted: +1 +1 Voting summary: http://portal.eclipse.org/ ___ linuxtools-dev mailing list linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev

[linuxtools-dev] +1 for Matthew Khouzam on technology.linux-distros by Chris Aniszczyk

Chris Aniszczyk voted: +1 +1 Voting summary: http://portal.eclipse.org/ ___ linuxtools-dev mailing list linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev

[linuxtools-dev] +1 for Rafael Medeiros Teixeira on technology.linux-distros by Chris Aniszczyk

Chris Aniszczyk voted: +1 +1 Voting summary: http://portal.eclipse.org/ ___ linuxtools-dev mailing list linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev

[linuxtools-dev] +1 for Rodrigo Fraxino Araujo on technology.linux-distros by Chris Aniszczyk

Chris Aniszczyk voted: +1 +1 Voting summary: http://portal.eclipse.org/ ___ linuxtools-dev mailing list linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev