- "Jeff Johnston" wrote:
> Please add your confirmations below:
>
> +1 Autotools
> +1 Libhover
> +1 ChangeLog
+1 Autotools
+1 Libhover
+1 ChangeLog
+1 Valgrind
+1 Oprofile
+1 Callgraph
+1 RPM Specfile Editor
---
Severin
___
linuxtools-dev mailing
- "William Cohen" wrote:
> On 11/05/2010 10:43 AM, William Cohen wrote:
> > In the past the OProfile eclipse plug-in has used a binary interface
> to read the OProfile sample files. For Fedora the binary interface has
> been provided by static libraries oprofile-devel rpm. To follow the
> pac
- Original Message -
> On 04:19:47 pm Wednesday, January 12, 2011 Andrew Overholt wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > Happy new year, everyone. If you recently had some holidays, I hope
> > they were nice.
> >
> > I know we discussed this before but I'd like to once again bring up
> > the
> > topic of m
- Original Message -
> On Fri, 2011-01-14 at 11:21 -0600, Maynard Johnson wrote:
> > It seems to me that the above problems could be eliminated by
> > updating the
> > plugin to use oprofile's native XML output for sample data and event
> > listings.
> > Are there any plans for such an upda
- Original Message -
> If people have pointers to good guides when they learned git, I'm sure
> those of us less experienced with git would appreciate you sharing
> them.
Two good resources are (aside from the EGit user guide, of course):
http://progit.org/book/ (Pro Git book)
http://libra
On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 09:28 -0500, Andrew Overholt wrote:
> * William Cohen [2011-02-10 09:27]:
> > On 02/10/2011 09:19 AM, Andrew Overholt wrote:
> > >> what's the status of abandoning opxml?
> > >> It seems to me that it's still in use...
> > >
> > > The upcoming 0.7 release removes its use.
>
On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 08:48 -0600, Maynard Johnson wrote:
> Severin Gehwolf wrote:
> > On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 09:28 -0500, Andrew Overholt wrote:
> >> * William Cohen [2011-02-10 09:27]:
> >>> On 02/10/2011 09:19 AM, Andrew Overholt wrote:
> >>>>> w
On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 13:24 -0600, Maynard Johnson wrote:
> Severin Gehwolf wrote:
> > On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 08:48 -0600, Maynard Johnson wrote:
> >> Severin Gehwolf wrote:
> >>> On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 09:28 -0500, Andrew Overholt wrote:
> >>>> * Willia
On Fri, 2011-02-11 at 10:04 -0200, Daniel HB wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 15:21 -0500, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
> > On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 13:24 -0600, Maynard Johnson wrote:
> > > Severin Gehwolf wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 08:48 -0600, Maynard Johnson w
zeImpl(Native Method)
> at java.lang.J9VMInternals.initialize(J9VMInternals.java:196)
> ... 9 more
>
>
> - daniel
>
> On Fri, 2011-02-11 at 14:08 -0200, danie...@br.ibm.com wrote:
> > On Fri, 2011-02-11 at 09:35 -0500, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
> > > On
On Fri, 2011-02-25 at 15:49 -0300, Daniel HB wrote:
> I'm currently trying to make the Oprofile plugin work on a Power6
> machine. I've come to this mailing list a couple weeks ago with a
> complaint that generated a bug
> ( https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=336977 ) which we
> managed
Hi,
On Mon, 2011-05-02 at 15:23 -0300, danie...@br.ibm.com wrote:
> I've being working on the Helgrind plugin for Eclipse and now I think it's
> good enough
> to be contributed. There are things that probably need more work ( I
> noticed that some
> Valgrind plugins have separated test plugins,
Hi,
On Mon, 2011-05-30 at 20:32 -0400, Francois Chouinard wrote:
> [7] Thoughts
>
> I think you have pretty much covered the launching aspects for
> profiling. With some additions, I guess that tracing can also be well
> served although there are still some question marks on my side (namely
> dyn
Hi,
On Fri, 2011-06-03 at 17:06 -0400, Andrew Overholt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We have a new signed build in updates-nightly [1] that I'd like to be
> our RC4 contribution:
>
> https://hudson.eclipse.org/hudson/job/cbi-linuxtools-Indigo/345/
>
> Please smoke test it and put it through its paces as m
Hi,
On Thu, 2011-08-04 at 10:59 +0200, Eric Schwarz wrote:
> Hi
>
>
> I have troubles starting OProfile (0.9.4 latest Version for CentOS) out
> of Eclipse on CentOS.
>
> I have tried using CentOS 5.4 + Eclipse Helios 2 SR2 in a virtual
> machine (put in timer interrupt mode like described in
sudo" seems to be the hint
>
> >>> Did you verify that oprofile works as expected on the command line?
>
> YES. I did it like on http://blogs.epfl.ch/article/24223
>
> I also tried with the latest nightly build today> did not work either
>
>
>
a VM to get anything
> other than no data.
Eric, if you run install.sh only on a clean install and on a physical
machine you should definitely be able to use oprofile from within
Eclipse. Make sure that you have the usermode RPM package installed.
--Severin
> > Am 04.08.2011 15:00, schrieb S
Hi,
I'd like to propose an update to the Git branching policy of Linux
Tools[1]. The idea is to make it easier for developers to use the main
repository to share code (i.e. have remote feature branches) and to make
it more apparent which branches are maintenance branches of released
versions. I pr
- Original Message -
> >
> > 1. Branch "master" remains the main development tree.
> > 2. Name-space maintenance branches with prefix "released/"
> > 3. Name-space shared feature branches with prefix "features/"
>
> > The benefits of this would be to encourage collaboratio
On Mon, 2011-11-14 at 09:29 -0500, Andrew Overholt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> * Severin Gehwolf [2011-11-09 10:13]:
> > 2. Name-space maintenance branches with prefix "released/"
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > What do you think?
>
> Thanks for p
- Original Message -
>
> >> Thanks for proposing this, Severin. In general I like it. My
> >> only
> >> concern is the difference between features and tags for releases.
> >> Will
> >> people be confused by released/{stable-,}0.9 being the maintenance
> >> branch for 0.9 micro releases?
On Fri, 2012-01-27 at 16:50 -0500, Andrew Overholt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Gerrit ([1], web-based code review system) is almost ready for usage by
> all eclipse.org projects [2].
>
> How do Linux Tools contributors and committers feel about using it for
> Linux Tools?
+1. I'm a big fan of code review :
- Original Message -
> It is believed that code reviews for commits sized < 300 LOC discover
> 60-70% of bugs, but that ratio falls very quickly if the patches are
> bigger, so kind of a coding discipline will be required.
That is very true. Small reviews are beautiful :)
--Severin
__
Severin Gehwolf voted:
+1
Welcome!
Voting summary: http://portal.eclipse.org/
___
linuxtools-dev mailing list
linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev
Severin Gehwolf voted:
+1
Welcome!
Voting summary: http://portal.eclipse.org/
___
linuxtools-dev mailing list
linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev
Severin Gehwolf voted:
+1
Welcome!
Voting summary: http://portal.eclipse.org/
___
linuxtools-dev mailing list
linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev
Severin Gehwolf voted:
+1
Welcome!
Voting summary: http://portal.eclipse.org/
___
linuxtools-dev mailing list
linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev
Severin Gehwolf voted:
+1
Welcome!
Voting summary: http://portal.eclipse.org/
___
linuxtools-dev mailing list
linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev
Severin Gehwolf voted:
+1
Welcome!
Voting summary: http://portal.eclipse.org/
___
linuxtools-dev mailing list
linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev
Severin Gehwolf voted:
+1
Welcome!
Voting summary: http://portal.eclipse.org/
___
linuxtools-dev mailing list
linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev
Severin Gehwolf voted:
+1
Welcome!
Voting summary: http://portal.eclipse.org/
___
linuxtools-dev mailing list
linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev
Severin Gehwolf voted:
+1
Welcome!
Voting summary: http://portal.eclipse.org/
___
linuxtools-dev mailing list
linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev
Severin Gehwolf voted:
+1
Welcome!
Voting summary: http://portal.eclipse.org/
___
linuxtools-dev mailing list
linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev
Severin Gehwolf voted:
+1
Welcome!
Voting summary: http://portal.eclipse.org/
___
linuxtools-dev mailing list
linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev
34 matches
Mail list logo
