On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 6:50 PM, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 10:15:16AM -0700, Jason Gerecke wrote:
>> On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 8:26 PM, Peter Hutterer
>> wrote:
>> > On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 11:17:15AM -0700, Jason Gerecke wrote:
>
> [cutting some context. why? because I can!]
>
On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 10:15:16AM -0700, Jason Gerecke wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 8:26 PM, Peter Hutterer
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 11:17:15AM -0700, Jason Gerecke wrote:
[cutting some context. why? because I can!]
> >> The latter is changed by wcmUpdateButtonKeyActions
> >> (a
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 8:26 PM, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 11:17:15AM -0700, Jason Gerecke wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 9:21 PM, Peter Hutterer
>> wrote:
>> > On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 11:51:22PM -0700, Jason Gerecke wrote:
>> >> On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 9:04 PM, Peter Hutt
On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 11:17:15AM -0700, Jason Gerecke wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 9:21 PM, Peter Hutterer
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 11:51:22PM -0700, Jason Gerecke wrote:
> >> On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 9:04 PM, Peter Hutterer
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 01:54:45PM -
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 9:21 PM, Peter Hutterer
wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 11:51:22PM -0700, Jason Gerecke wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 9:04 PM, Peter Hutterer
>> wrote:
>> > On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 01:54:45PM -0700, Jason Gerecke wrote:
>> >> Since the worker functions now check that
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 11:51:22PM -0700, Jason Gerecke wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 9:04 PM, Peter Hutterer
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 01:54:45PM -0700, Jason Gerecke wrote:
> >> Since the worker functions now check that they have the appropriate
> >> number of arguments, its possib
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 9:04 PM, Peter Hutterer
wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 01:54:45PM -0700, Jason Gerecke wrote:
>> Since the worker functions now check that they have the appropriate
>> number of arguments, its possible to decrease the number of arguments
>> required by 'set'. Since all it
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 01:54:45PM -0700, Jason Gerecke wrote:
> Since the worker functions now check that they have the appropriate
> number of arguments, its possible to decrease the number of arguments
> required by 'set'. Since all it really needs is a device number and
> a property, the minimu
Since the worker functions now check that they have the appropriate
number of arguments, its possible to decrease the number of arguments
required by 'set'. Since all it really needs is a device number and
a property, the minimum argc is now 2.
A handy side-effect of this change is that its now po