Hi Peter,
Peter Hutterer said the following on 11/28/2012 01:43 AM:
[...]
I have to admit, this confused me quite a bit during testing (reason was
that I forgot to install the data files at first, so list-local-devices gave
me wrong values).
turns out integration_flags is the one read from
Olivier Fourdan said the following on 11/29/2012 05:49 PM:
[...]
It should be the other way around. The kernel flags are used only if
the integration flags are not set in the database.
Sorry please ignore that sentence in my previous reply, it was left
over from a first draft... meh :(
Peter Hutterer said the following on 11/27/2012 12:27 AM:
[...]
+ device-integration_flags = WACOM_DEVICE_INTEGRATED_NONE;
+ for (i = 0; string_list[i]; i++) {
+ for (n = 0; n G_N_ELEMENTS (integration_flags); n++) {
+
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 11:02:03AM +0100, Olivier Fourdan wrote:
Peter Hutterer said the following on 11/27/2012 12:27 AM:
[...]
+device-integration_flags = WACOM_DEVICE_INTEGRATED_NONE;
+for (i = 0; string_list[i]; i++) {
+for (n = 0; n
Olivier Fourdan said the following on 11/26/2012 08:44 AM:
So how about making UNSET internal-only (in which case you can
leave it as
-1) but filter it to NONE before returning it to the client?
Yeap, agreed, updated patch attached. Not USER is filtered out and
NONE is returned to the
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 08:44:56AM +0100, Olivier Fourdan wrote:
Hi Peter,
Peter Hutterer said the following on 11/26/2012 07:47 AM:
[...]
I'd like to get this API right before we make it public and have clients
depend on it, with all the lag that entails (I know you already have
something
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 09:28:26AM +0100, Olivier Fourdan wrote:
Hey Peter,
Peter Hutterer said the following on 11/23/2012 12:21 AM:
[...]
two things:
I'd like to see a test that screams bloody murder when the flag is in fact
unset. presumably if we add new devices we known whether
Hey Peter,
Peter Hutterer said the following on 11/23/2012 12:21 AM:
[...]
two things:
I'd like to see a test that screams bloody murder when the flag is in fact
unset. presumably if we add new devices we known whether they're built-in
and the test should complain if we forget to add this.
On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 01:22:11PM +0100, Olivier Fourdan wrote:
From 15f93f5d3bd9f2aefd59a5087b2ce44a3c53403c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Olivier Fourdan ofour...@redhat.com
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2012 12:04:45 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] lib: add IntegratedIn to device group
to describe
From 15f93f5d3bd9f2aefd59a5087b2ce44a3c53403c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Olivier Fourdan ofour...@redhat.com
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2012 12:04:45 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] lib: add IntegratedIn to device group
to describe integrated system devices and screen tablets.
A bit field allows to
10 matches
Mail list logo
