On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 03:06:27PM +0100, Eduard Hasenleithner wrote:
> Hi Ping
>
> 2011/3/12 Ping Cheng :
> > Do you mind testing the patch and sending a "Tested-by" to the list if it
> > does the job for you?
>
> Thanks for the notice, I did not yet completely understand how the
> development f
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 6:06 AM, Eduard Hasenleithner wrote:
> Hi Ping
>
> 2011/3/12 Ping Cheng :
> > Do you mind testing the patch and sending a "Tested-by" to the list if it
> > does the job for you?
>
> Thanks for the notice, I did not yet completely understand how the
> development for xf86-in
2011/3/12 Eduard Hasenleithner :
> One thing I can notice is that nothing in the "test" directory is
> built automatically when doing make in the root directory. A "make
> wacom-tests" in "test" does work though.
Ah, I found now the wiki page for TestSuite. "make check" works fine
with the patch.
Hi Ping
2011/3/12 Ping Cheng :
> Do you mind testing the patch and sending a "Tested-by" to the list if it
> does the job for you?
Thanks for the notice, I did not yet completely understand how the
development for xf86-input-wacom works. Apparently the patches are not
only for documentation purpo
Hi Eduard,
Do you mind testing the patch and sending a "Tested-by" to the list if it
does the job for you?
Thank you for reporting and testing the issue.
Ping
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 4:20 PM, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> test/Makefile.am included src/Makefile.am for the driver sources. However,
> th
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 10:20:15AM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> test/Makefile.am included src/Makefile.am for the driver sources. However,
> that also lead to the driver being built twice, once in src/ and once in
> test/. On make install, test/wacom_drv.so would overwrite the
> src/wacom_drv.so
