On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 05:58:37PM -0800, Ping Cheng wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Ping Cheng wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 4:24 PM, Peter Hutterer
> > wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> > the problem with that patch was IIRC that it was based on some mistaken
> >> assumptions. e.g. the re
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Ping Cheng wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 4:24 PM, Peter Hutterer
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
> the problem with that patch was IIRC that it was based on some mistaken
>> assumptions. e.g. the refcounting was working completely different to what
>> you tried to do. so it w
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 4:24 PM, Peter Hutterer wrote:
>
>
the problem with that patch was IIRC that it was based on some mistaken
> assumptions. e.g. the refcounting was working completely different to what
> you tried to do. so it was more a problem with the patch itself than
> anything related t
On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 11:44:09AM -0800, Ping Cheng wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 5:55 PM, Peter Hutterer
> wrote:
>
> > Following up on this, I just bumped the version in git to 0.10.99.
> >
> > New release versioning scheme until we settle on a stable 1.0:
> > - 0.x.99 is the version number
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 5:55 PM, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> Following up on this, I just bumped the version in git to 0.10.99.
>
> New release versioning scheme until we settle on a stable 1.0:
> - 0.x.99 is the version number in-between releases
> - 0.x.99.901 is the first RC
> - 0.x.99.902 is the se
Following up on this, I just bumped the version in git to 0.10.99.
New release versioning scheme until we settle on a stable 1.0:
- 0.x.99 is the version number in-between releases
- 0.x.99.901 is the first RC
- 0.x.99.902 is the second RC
- 0.x+1.0 is next the release
Any version bump other than
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 10:48:32PM -0800, Ping Cheng wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 7:45 PM, Peter Hutterer
> wrote:
>
> > Looking back at the release history of xf86-input-wacom 0.10.x, we have the
> > following release windows (rough approximations):
> > 0.10.1 - baseline
> > 0.10.2 ~2 weeks
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 12:18:24PM -0800, Jason Gerecke wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 7:45 PM, Peter Hutterer
> wrote:
> > What I'd like to commit to is regular releases. While the misc cleanup is
> > still going strong, we can't and shouldn't just line up with X server
> > releases. So what I
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 7:45 PM, Peter Hutterer
wrote:
> What I'd like to commit to is regular releases. While the misc cleanup is
> still going strong, we can't and shouldn't just line up with X server
> releases. So what I propose is an approcimately monthly release with a
> driver release ever
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 7:45 PM, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> Looking back at the release history of xf86-input-wacom 0.10.x, we have the
> following release windows (rough approximations):
> 0.10.1 - baseline
> 0.10.2 ~2 weeks
> 0.10.3 ~3 weeks
> 0.10.4 ~4 weeks
> 0.10.5 ~8 weeks
> 0.10.6 ~6 week
10 matches
Mail list logo